Literature DB >> 16816088

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery.

.   

Abstract

In light of recent studies that further clarify the long-term risks of vaginal breech delivery, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that the decision regarding mode of delivery should depend on the experience of the health care provider Cesarean delivery will be the preferred mode for most physicians because of the diminish-ing expertise in vaginal breech delivery. Planned vaginal delivery of a term singleton breech fetus may be reasonable under hospital-specific protocol guidelines for both eligibility and labor management. Before a vaginal breech delivery is planned, women should be informed that the risk of peri-natal or neonatal mortality or short-term serious neonatal morbidity may be higher than if a cesarean delivery is planned, and the patient's informed con-sent should be documented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816088     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200607000-00058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  22 in total

1.  Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003.

Authors:  Henry Chong Lee; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Jeffrey B Gould
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.

Authors:  J Burgos; L Rodríguez; P Cobos; C Osuna; M Del Mar Centeno; R Larrieta; T Martínez-Astorquiza; L Fernández-Llebrez
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center.

Authors:  James Deline; Lisa Varnes-Epstein; Lee T Dresang; Mark Gideonsen; Laura Lynch; John J Frey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Maternal complications associated with stillbirth delivery: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  K J Gold; E L Mozurkewich; K S Puder; M C Treadwell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Vaginal birth after two previous caesarean deliveries in a patient with uterus didelphys and an interuterine septal defect.

Authors:  Njoki Ng'ang'a; Jonathan Ratzersdorfer; Yaakov Abdelhak
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-05

6.  Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences.

Authors:  Margaret Olivia Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Breech presentation: a retrospective analysis of 12-years' experience at a single center.

Authors:  Mariella Mailàth-Pokorny; Oliver Preyer; Christian Dadak; Andreas Lischka; Martina Mittlböck; Peter Wagenbichler; Thomas Laml
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Paul S Spencer; Yuval Weiss; Gary Ginsberg; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-02-24

9.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Talcum powder or aqueous gel to aid external cephalic version: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Narayanan Vallikkannu; Wan Nordin Nadzratulaiman; Siti Zawiah Omar; Khaing Si Lay; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.