Literature DB >> 33201453

Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.

Bridget Basile Ibrahim1, Holly Powell Kennedy2, Margaret L Holland2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In order to better understand the current rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States, 2017 U.S. birth certificate data were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with the outcome of a VBAC.
METHODS: The 2017 Natality Limited Geography Dataset and block sequential logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with subsequent births in 2017 in the United States to women with a history of 1 or 2 cesareans (N = 540,711).
RESULTS: The adjusted odds of VBAC were 6% higher for Black women (1.06; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.08) and 18% higher for American Indian/Alaska Native women (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27) relative to white women. Asian/Pacific Islander women were 9% less likely to have a VBAC (aOR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) than similar white women with a history of cesarean delivery. Latina women had a 10% less likelihood of a VBAC (aOR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) when compared with non-Latina women. Women with a high school education (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.88) or some college (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.87) were less likely to have a VBAC than women educated at a baccalaureate level or higher. Women whose births were paid for by Medicaid had a 5% increased likelihood of VBAC over women with private insurance (aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07). Women who self-pay have twice the likelihood of VBAC (aOR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.92, 2.07) compared to women with private insurance. The adjusted odds of VBAC were lowest for women giving birth in Southern states (aOR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.74) and highest for women giving birth in the Midwest (aOR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.22) relative to women in the Northeastern U.S. Thirteen percent (13%) of women who had a VBAC had a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) birth attendant, which is 44% higher than the national CNM-attended birth rate. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Significant variation exists in VBAC rates based on a number of sociodemographic and geographic factors, likely reflecting disparities in access to vaginal birth after cesarean and differences in preference regarding mode of birth after cesarean. Further research is recommended to better understand and address these disparities to improve maternity care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparity; Geography; Race/ethnicity; VBAC; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201453      PMCID: PMC8126565          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-03066-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  15 in total

1.  The validity of information on "race" and "Hispanic ethnicity" in California birth certificate data.

Authors:  L Baumeister; K Marchi; M Pearl; R Williams; P Braveman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center.

Authors:  James Deline; Lisa Varnes-Epstein; Lee T Dresang; Mark Gideonsen; Laura Lynch; John J Frey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer Sherburne Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

4.  Women's preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald E Iverson; Lois McCloskey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Mary T Paterno
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Planned Home VBAC in the United States, 2004-2009: Outcomes, Maternity Care Practices, and Implications for Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Kim J Cox; Marit L Bovbjerg; Melissa Cheyney; Lawrence M Leeman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Racial disparity in the success and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Jeffery Peipert; Erika Stevens; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Does continuity of care impact decision making in the next birth after a caesarean section (VBAC)? a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Karyn Besley; Jennifer Bell; Deborah Davis; Jon Adams; Alison Porteous; Maralyn Foureur
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  3 in total

1.  "I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; M Tish Knobf; Allison Shorten; Saraswathi Vedam; Melissa Cheyney; Jessica Illuzzi; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.081

2.  Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Holly Powell Kennedy; Joan Combellick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Saraswathi Vedam; Jessica Illuzzi; Melissa Cheyney; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.