Literature DB >> 23149214

Initial development of a questionnaire evaluating perceived benefits and barriers to pediatric clinical trials participation.

Lamia P Barakat1, Chavis A Patterson, Valerie Mondestin, Veronica Chavez, Tahirah Austin, M Renée Robinson, Yimei Li, Kim Smith-Whitley, Robyn Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perceived benefits and barriers to pediatric clinical trials participation to improve decision-making and enhance recruitment and retention among minority youth with chronic health conditions (sickle cell disease, asthma) and their caregivers.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on the social ecological model using input from medical experts and community-based public health organizations. Parallel caregiver, adolescent/young adult (AYA; 16-39 years old), and child (8-15 years old) versions were field tested. Patients and caregivers completed the questionnaire, which included demographic items, perceived life stress and social desirability measures.
RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis rendered a four-factor solution for the caregiver version (direct treatment benefit, mistrust of research/researchers, trust in healthcare team to engage in safe research, and opportunity cost) and the AYA version (mistrust/no direct benefit, safety, direct treatment benefit/practical considerations, and social support for research). Factor structures differed for SCD and asthma caregivers; results were equivocal for the child version. Summated subscales were not significantly associated with patient demographics or social desirability, but significant correlations with perceived life stress and prior participation in research were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: While the factor structure should be confirmed with larger samples, findings indicate potential benefit, perceived harm due to mistrust of researchers, and logistics are primary factors in decision-making about participation in pediatric clinical trials. By addressing these benefits/barriers through adjustments to recruitment and informed consent procedures, researchers may address misperceptions of research, improve decision-making, and increase recruitment and retention particularly for ethnic minority children with chronic health conditions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23149214     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  21 in total

1.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the HPV Clinical Trial Survey for Parents (CTSP-HPV) Using Traditional Survey Development Methods and Community Engagement Principles.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunningham; Kenneth A Wallston; Consuelo H Wilkins; Pamela C Hull; Stephania T Miller
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Barriers and facilitators of clinical trial enrollment in a network of community-based pediatric oncology clinics.

Authors:  Carolyn Russo; Linda Stout; Toni House; Victor M Santana
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making.

Authors:  C S D'Amanda; H L Peay; A C Wheeler; E Turbitt; B B Biesecker
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-02-12

4.  Randomization is not associated with socio-economic and demographic factors in a multi-center clinical trial of children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Dionna O Roberts; Brittany Covert; Mark J Rodeghier; Nagina Parmar; Michael R DeBaun; Alexis A Thompson; Robert I Liem
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Mistrust of Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials Research.

Authors:  Evelyn M Stevens; Chavis A Patterson; Yimei B Li; Kim Smith-Whitley; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Why do children decide not to participate in clinical research: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Martine C de Vries; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  "Watching time tick by…": Decision making for Duchenne muscular dystrophy trials.

Authors:  Holly L Peay; Hadar Scharff; Aad Tibben; Benjamin Wilfond; Janice Bowie; Joanna Johnson; Kanneboyina Nagaraju; Diana Escolar; Jonathan Piacentino; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Carlton Haywood; Sophie Lanzkron; Marie Diener-West; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; John J Strouse; Shawn Bediako; Gladys Onojobi; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  A Qualitative Study of Phase III Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Decision-Making: Perspectives from Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Providers.

Authors:  Lamia P Barakat; Lisa A Schwartz; Anne Reilly; Janet A Deatrick; Frank Balis
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation among parents of children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Holly L Peay; Barbara B Biesecker; Benjamin S Wilfond; Jill Jarecki; Kendall L Umstead; Diana M Escolar; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.