Literature DB >> 25856170

Why do children decide not to participate in clinical research: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Irma M Hein1, Pieter W Troost1, Martine C de Vries2, Catherijne A J Knibbe3, Johannes B van Goudoever4, Ramón J L Lindauer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More pediatric drug trials are needed, but although specific pediatric regulations warrant safety, recruitment of children for these trials remains one of the main difficulties. Therefore, we investigated potential determining factors of nonparticipation in clinical research, in order to optimize research participation of children by recommending improved recruitment strategies.
METHODS: Between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2014, we performed a prospective study among161 pediatric patients, aged 6 to 18 y, who were eligible for clinical research. We quantitatively analyzed the association of potential explanatory variables (e.g., age, cognitive development, experience, ethnicity) with nonparticipation and qualitatively analyzed interviews on reasons for nonparticipation.
RESULTS: Sixty percent of the children did not participate in the research project on offer (39% decided not to participate, 21% were indecisive). Lower age, less disease experience, and less complex research with lower risk were predictive for not participating. Time constraint and extra burden were expressed as decisive reasons for not participating.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to optimize research participation should be aimed at younger children and their families, who are logistically challenged and unfamiliar with health care and research. Recommendations include informing pediatric patients and their families of the value of research; minimizing logistic burdens; and improving accessibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25856170     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2015.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  16 in total

1.  Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Leah Belsky; Kimberly M Thompson; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  STI research: recruiting an unbiased sample.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Julie M Thistlethwaite; Jill S Huppert
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 3.  Ethical issues in adolescent and parent informed consent for pediatric asthma research participation.

Authors:  David G Scherer; Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.515

4.  Accuracy of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR) for measuring children's competence to consent to clinical research.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Marc A Benninga; C Michel Zwaan; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Ethics is for human subjects too: participant perspectives on responsibility in health research.

Authors:  Susan M Cox; Michael McDonald
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Adolescent perspectives on phase I cancer research.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Justin N Baker; Angela C Leek; Sabahat Hizlan; Susan R Rheingold; Amy D Yamokoski; Dennis Drotar; Eric Kodish
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Predicting adolescent asthma research participation decisions from a structural equations model of protocol factors.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Charles W Turner; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Jeanne Dalen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Susan M Cox
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Martine C de Vries; C Michel Zwaan; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.125

View more
  5 in total

1.  The challenges of research participation by children.

Authors:  Frank H Bloomfield
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Monitoring the recovery time of children after tonsillectomy using commercial activity trackers.

Authors:  Philip Lambrechtse; Victoria C Ziesenitz; Andrew Atkinson; Ernst Jan Bos; Tatjana Welzel; Yael Gilgen; Nicolas Gürtler; Simone Heuscher; Adam Frederik Cohen; Johannes N van den Anker
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Researching the Experiences of Children with Cancer: Considerations for Practice.

Authors:  Jessika Boles; Sarah Daniels
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils.

Authors:  Jana Reetz; Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Christine Glinicke; Stephanie Darabaneanu; Alena Buyx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Patient and caregiver engagement in research: factors that influence co-enrollment in research.

Authors:  Leanne K Elliott; Herman Bami; Maxwell J Gelkopf; Ryan C Yee; Brian M Feldman; Y Ingrid Goh
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.054

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.