Literature DB >> 30747463

Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making.

C S D'Amanda1, H L Peay2, A C Wheeler2, E Turbitt1, B B Biesecker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this research was to understand parental proxy decision-making for drug trial participation for children with Fragile X syndrome (FXS). Specifically, we aimed to capture preferences, motivations, influencing factors and barriers related to trial involvement among trial joiners and decliners and describe ease of trial decision-making and decisional regret.
METHODS: Interviews were conducted with parents from two groups: those who chose to enrol their child with FXS in a trial (N = 16; Joiners) and those who declined trial participation (N = 15; Decliners). Data were coded and interpreted through inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: Prominent decisional factors included attitudes about medicating FXS symptoms, potential for direct benefit (primarily evaluated through the degree of match between target outcomes and child symptomatology and drug mechanism), logistical convenience and perceived risks of side effects. The ultimate motivation for participation was potential for direct benefit. None of the parents reported decisional regret, and ease of decision-making ranged from easy to difficult for our participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic optimism was high among those who elected participation. Parents may benefit from an explanation of the rationale behind chosen outcome variables and may be more interested in trials that target or measure as an exploratory outcome the symptoms they find most concerning. Our findings reinforce the need for future trials to reduce participant inconvenience. Our results contrast with what has previously been observed in parents of children with life-threatening conditions; parents of children with FXS may be more trial risk averse and find trial decisions to be harder. Parents of children with FXS considering trials may benefit from a decisional intervention aimed at deliberating motivations and barriers. © Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragile X syndrome; clinical trials; decisional factors; parents; proxy decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30747463      PMCID: PMC6639141          DOI: 10.1111/jir.12605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  29 in total

1.  Parents' views of their children's participation in phase I oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Janet A Deatrick; Denise B Angst; Carol Moore
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Youths' and their parents' attitudes and experiences about participation in psychopharmacology treatment research.

Authors:  Karen Dineen Wagner; Melissa Martinez; Thomas Joiner
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 3.  Fragile X syndrome and autism at the intersection of genetic and neural networks.

Authors:  Matthew K Belmonte; Thomas Bourgeron
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Family patterns of decision-making in pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Julia A Snethen; Marion E Broome; Kathleen Knafl; Janet A Deatrick; Denise B Angst
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Recruitment of infants with sickle cell anemia to a Phase III trial: data from the BABY HUG study.

Authors:  Lynn Wynn; Scott Miller; Lane Faughnan; Zhaoyu Luo; Ellen Debenham; Lea Adix; Billie Fish; Tally Hustace; Tracy Kelly; Marylou Macdermott; Joan Marasciulo; Brenda Martin; Jennifer McDuffie; Mary Murphy; Betsy Rackoff; Caroline Reed; Phillip Seaman; Glenda Thomas; Winfred Wang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Co-occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: findings from a national parent survey.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Murrey Olmsted; David B Holiday
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Robert C Griggs; Mark Batshaw; Mary Dunkle; Rashmi Gopal-Srivastava; Edward Kaye; Jeffrey Krischer; Tan Nguyen; Kathleen Paulus; Peter A Merkel
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 8.  Advances in the treatment of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Randi J Hagerman; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Walter E Kaufmann; Michele Y Ono; Nicole Tartaglia; Ave Lachiewicz; Rebecca Kronk; Carol Delahunty; David Hessl; Jeannie Visootsak; Jonathan Picker; Louise Gane; Michael Tranfaglia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  Mark F Bear; Kimberly M Huber; Stephen T Warren
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  An exploratory survey of nurses' perceptions of phase I clinical trials in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Ann Chang
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.