Literature DB >> 23147522

Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications.

Christina Bannert1, Karoline Reinhart, Daniela Dunkler, Michael Trauner, Friedrich Renner, Peter Knoflach, Arnulf Ferlitsch, Werner Weiss, Monika Ferlitsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Quality indicators including cecal intubation rate (CIR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) are established. Sex differences of quality indicators are observed, but the influence of sedation has not been investigated so far. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of sedation on quality indicators, including CIR and ADR, according to sex.
METHODS: We analyzed data of 52,506 screening colonoscopies performed by 196 endoscopists between November 2007 and April 2011 according to the Austrian "quality management for colon cancer prevention" program.
RESULTS: Sedation did not affect polyp detection rate (women P=0.7972, men P=0.3711) or ADR for both sexes (women P=0.2773, men P=0.8676). ADR was not significantly influenced by sedation (P=0.1272), but by age and sex (both P<0.0001), when the executing endoscopist was considered. Although women were more often sedated than men (90.70 vs. 81.83%; P<0.0001), CIR was slightly lower in women than in men (94.69 vs. 96.58%; P<0.0001). Sedation improved the CIR in women by 2.95% (94.96 vs. 92.01%; P<0.0001), whereas in men it was just by 1.28% (96.81 vs. 95.53%; P<0.0001). Sedated women only reached the CIR of unsedated men (94.96 vs. 95.53%; P=0.1005). Accounting for the intra-observer influence of the endoscopist, the overall CIR was influenced by the interaction of sex and age (P=0.0049), but not by sedation (P=0.1435).
CONCLUSIONS: Sedation does not increase adenoma or polyp detection, although it leads to an increase in CIR in men and women. This effect is more pronounced in women, yet CIR of men remains higher compared with women. Quality indicators are mainly influenced by the patient's age, sex, and the endoscopists' individual performance, rather than the endoscopists' subspeciality or procedural experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147522     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  25 in total

1.  Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Maida Sewitch; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 2.  Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014?

Authors:  Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira; Marília Cravo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 3.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

4.  Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon.

Authors:  Peter Klare; Stefan Ascher; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Petra Wolf; Analena Beitz; Roland M Schmid; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

6.  Endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates benefit from high-definition endoscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Martha Britto-Arias; Irina Gessl; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Daniela Sallinger; Michael Trauner; Werner Weiss; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Monitoring of colonoscopy quality indicators in an academic endoscopy facility reveals adherence to international recommendations.

Authors:  Stefanos Karamaroudis; Aliki Stamou; Stamatia C Vorri; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Vasilios Papadopoulos; Georgios Tziatzios; Aikaterini Karagouni; Panagiota Katsouli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

8.  Optimized sedation improves colonoscopy quality long-term.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Athanasios D Sioulas; Theodora Kalli; Nikolaos Misailidis; Dimitrios Polymeros; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; George Karamanolis; Spiros D Ladas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Colonoscopy without sedation: Patient factors alone are less likely to influence its uptake.

Authors:  Nusrat Iqbal; Sean Ramcharan; Samer Doughan; Irshad Shaikh
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 10.  A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.

Authors:  Robyn S Sharma; Peter G Rossos
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.