Literature DB >> 25996612

Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.

Majid A Almadi, Maida Sewitch, Alan N Barkun, Myriam Martel, Lawrence Joseph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operator fatigue may negatively influence adenoma detection (AD) during screening colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To better characterize factors affecting AD, including the number of hours worked, and the number and type of procedures performed before an index screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving individuals undergoing a screening colonoscopy at a major tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Quebec. Individuals were identified using an endoscopic reporting database; AD was identified by an electronic chart review. A hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between patient- and endoscopist-related variables and AD.
RESULTS: A total of 430 consecutive colonoscopies performed by 10 gastroenterologists and two surgeons were included. Patient mean (± SD) age was 63.4±10.9 years, 56.3% were males, 27.7% had undergone a previous colonoscopy and the cecal intubation rate was 95.7%. The overall AD rate was 25.7%. Age was associated with AD (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.08]), while female sex (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25 to 0.75]), an indication for average-risk screening (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.80]) and an increase in the number of hours during which endoscopies were performed before the index colonoscopy (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.99]) were associated with lower AD rates. On exploratory univariable analysis, a threshold of 3 h of endoscopy time performed before the index colonoscopy was associated with decreased AD.
CONCLUSION: The number of hours devoted to endoscopies before the index colonoscopy was inversely associated with AD rate, with decreased performance possibly as early as within 3 h. This metric should be confirmed in future studies and considered when optimizing scheduling practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25996612      PMCID: PMC4578453          DOI: 10.1155/2015/789038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2291-2789


  53 in total

1.  Influence of previous night call and sleep deprivation on screening colonoscopy quality.

Authors:  Mark Benson; Ian Grimes; Deepak Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Anurag Soni; Holly Benson; Kerstin Austin; Patrick Pfau
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Philip Schoenfeld; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol Desantis; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend.

Authors:  Marc Kaneshiro; Andrew Ho; Michael Chan; Hartley Cohen; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Impact of lifestyle factors on colorectal polyp detection in the screening setting.

Authors:  C Hassan; P J Pickhardt; R Marmo; J R Choi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule.

Authors:  Gregory W Munson; Gavin C Harewood; Dawn L Francis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Mengzhu Jiang; Mélanie Fon Sing; Alan Barkun; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.

Authors:  Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Fnu Deepinder; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.

Authors:  Albert Do; Janice Weinberg; Aarti Kakkar; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Lisa Kaita; Gerry Taylor; Zoann Nugent; Charles Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  Spotting malignancies from gastric endoscopic images using deep learning.

Authors:  Jang Hyung Lee; Young Jae Kim; Yoon Woo Kim; Sungjin Park; Youn-I Choi; Yoon Jae Kim; Dong Kyun Park; Kwang Gi Kim; Jun-Won Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  No-Code Platform-Based Deep-Learning Models for Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Histology from White-Light Endoscopy Images: Development and Performance Verification.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Gong; Chang Seok Bang; Jae Jun Lee; Seung In Seo; Young Joo Yang; Gwang Ho Baik; Jong Wook Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-12

3.  Adenoma Detection Rate Falls at the End of the Day in a Large Multi-site Sample.

Authors:  Felippe O Marcondes; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Robert E Schoen; Seth D Crockett; Michele Morris; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

5.  Study on the influence of assistant experience on the quality of colonoscopy: A pilot single-center study.

Authors:  Lixia Fu; Mugen Dai; Junwei Liu; Hua Shi; Jundi Pan; Yanmei Lan; Miaoxia Shen; Xiaoduo Shao; Bin Ye
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Association of Intensive Endoscopic Screening Burden With Gastric Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Choong-Kyun Noh; Eunyoung Lee; Gil Ho Lee; Joon Koo Kang; Sun Gyo Lim; Bumhee Park; Jae Bum Park; Sung Jae Shin; Jae Youn Cheong; Jin Hong Kim; Kee Myung Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Application of Convolutional Neural Networks in the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Endoscopic Images.

Authors:  Satoki Shichijo; Shuhei Nomura; Kazuharu Aoyama; Yoshitaka Nishikawa; Motoi Miura; Takahide Shinagawa; Hirotoshi Takiyama; Tetsuya Tanimoto; Soichiro Ishihara; Keigo Matsuo; Tomohiro Tada
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Initial guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: a beginning.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Automated endoscopic detection and classification of colorectal polyps using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ozawa; Soichiro Ishihara; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Youichi Kumagai; Satoki Shichijo; Tomohiro Tada
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Use of ambient lighting during colonoscopy and its effect on adenoma detection rate and eye fatigue: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryan T Hoff; Andrew Mazulis; Meghana Doniparthi; Assad Munis; Anne Rivelli; Asif Lakha; Eli Ehrenpreis
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.