Literature DB >> 25593468

Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon.

Peter Klare1, Stefan Ascher1, Alexander Hapfelmeier1, Petra Wolf1, Analena Beitz1, Roland M Schmid1, Stefan von Delius1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relation of patient characteristics and procedural parameters to the endoscopic detection rate of colonic adenomas. Further to study, which factors may be capable to predict the localization of adenomatous lesions.
METHODS: We used the data base of a prospective randomized colonoscopy study (The ColoCap trial) to identify patients being diagnosed with colon adenoma. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to reveal predictors for adenoma detection in the entire colon and also with respect to the proximal and distal part. Covariates including age, gender, duration of colonoscopy and comorbidities were defined to determine association between predictors and adenoma detection.
RESULTS: Equal numbers of adenomas were detected in the proximal and distal side of the splenic flexure [126 (57%) vs 94 (43%), P = 0.104]. Simultaneous occurrence of adenomas in both sides of the colon was rare. The appearance of both proximal and distal adenoma was associated with increasing age (P = 0.008 and P = 0.024) and increasing duration of colonoscopy (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Male gender was a predictor for adenoma detection in the proximal colon (P = 0.008) but statistical significance was slightly missed with respect to the distal colon (P = 0.089). Alcohol abuse was found to be a predictor for the detection of distal adenoma (P = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: Increasing age and longer duration of colonoscopy are factors with a strong impact on adenoma detection both in the proximal and distal colon. Since proximal adenomas occurred in absence of distal adenomas, complete colonoscopy should be performed for screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal carcinoma; Distal; Proximal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25593468      PMCID: PMC4292284          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  39 in total

1.  Colonoscopy vs sigmoidoscopy screening: getting it right.

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  [S3-guideline colorectal cancer version 1.0].

Authors:  C Pox; S Aretz; S C Bischoff; U Graeven; M Hass; P Heußner; W Hohenberger; A Holstege; J Hübner; F Kolligs; M Kreis; P Lux; J Ockenga; R Porschen; S Post; N Rahner; A Reinacher-Schick; J F Riemann; R Sauer; A Sieg; W Scheppach; W Schmitt; H J Schmoll; K Schulmann; A Tannapfel; W Schmiegel
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  Diagnosis of sessile serrated polyps/adenomas: what does this mean for the pathologist, gastroenterologist and patient?

Authors:  Simon Leedham; James E East; Runjan Chetty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; David G Hewett; Dustin Lee Norton; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe and effective: a prospective Spanish study over 1000 consecutive exams.

Authors:  Alfredo J Lucendo; Antonio Olveira; Ana Belén Friginal-Ruiz; Danila Guagnozzi; Teresa Angueira; Mariluz Fernández-Fuente; Mercedes Cruz-Campos; Mercedes Serrano-Valverde; Marta Sánchez-Cazalilla; José M Tenias; Sonia González-Castillo
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Trends in colorectal incidence by anatomic subsite from 1985 to 2005: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Caldarella; E Crocetti; L Messerini; E Paci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, and risk of colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps.

Authors:  Martha J Shrubsole; Huiyun Wu; Reid M Ness; Yu Shyr; Walter E Smalley; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  1 in total

1.  Longer observation time increases adenoma detection in the proximal colon - a prospective study.

Authors:  Peter Klare; Henrik Phlipsen; Bernhard Haller; Henrik Einwächter; Andreas Weber; Mohamed Abdelhafez; Monther Bajbouj; Hayley Brown; Roland M Schmid; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-12-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.