Literature DB >> 23143647

Centromere positions in chicken and Japanese quail chromosomes: de novo centromere formation versus pericentric inversions.

Anna Zlotina1, Svetlana Galkina, Alla Krasikova, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Martien A M Groenen, Elena Gaginskaya, Svetlana Deryusheva.   

Abstract

Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA) and Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica, CCO) karyotypes are very similar. They have identical chromosome number (2n = 78) and show a high degree of synteny. Centromere positions on the majority of orthologous chromosomes are different in these two species. To explore the nature of this divergence, we used high-resolution comparative fluorescent in situ hybridization mapping on giant lampbrush chromosomes (LBCs) from growing oocytes. We applied 41 BAC clones specific for GGA1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 to chicken and quail LBCs. This approach allowed us to rule out a pericentric inversion earlier proposed to explain the difference between GGA1 and CCO1. In addition to a well-established large-scale pericentric inversion that discriminates GGA2 and CCO2, we identified another, smaller one in the large inverted region. For the first time, we described in detail inversions that distinguish GGA3 from CCO3 and GGA11 from CCO11. Despite the newly identified and confirmed inversions, our data suggest that, in chicken and Japanese quail, the difference in centromere positions is not mainly caused by pericentric inversions but is instead due to centromere repositioning events and the formation of new centromeres. We also consider the formation of short arms of quail microchromosomes by heterochromatin accumulation as a third scenario that could explain the discrepancy in centromeric indexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143647     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-012-9319-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  61 in total

1.  Micro- and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome.

Authors:  D K Griffin; F Haberman; J Masabanda; P O'Brien; M Bagga; A Sazanov; J Smith; D W Burt; M Ferguson-Smith; J Wienberg
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

2.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Satellite DNA in the karyotype evolution of domestic animals--clinical considerations.

Authors:  F Adega; H Guedes-Pinto; R Chaves
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  High-resolution mapping and transcriptional activity analysis of chicken centromere sequences on giant lampbrush chromosomes.

Authors:  Alla Krasikova; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Anna Zlotina
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  A 41-42 bp tandemly repeated sequence isolated from nuclear envelopes of chicken erythrocytes is located predominantly on microchromosomes.

Authors:  M A Matzke; F Varga; H Berger; J Schernthaner; D Schweizer; B Mayr; A J Matzke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Synteny conservation of the Z chromosome in 14 avian species (11 families) supports a role for Z dosage in avian sex determination.

Authors:  I Nanda; K Schlegelmilch; T Haaf; M Schartl; M Schmid
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 7.  Second report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2005.

Authors:  M Schmid; I Nanda; H Hoehn; M Schartl; T Haaf; J-M Buerstedde; H Arakawa; R B Caldwell; S Weigend; D W Burt; J Smith; D K Griffin; J S Masabanda; M A M Groenen; R P M A Crooijmans; A Vignal; V Fillon; M Morisson; F Pitel; M Vignoles; A Garrigues; J Gellin; A V Rodionov; S A Galkina; N A Lukina; G Ben-Ari; S Blum; J Hillel; T Twito; U Lavi; L David; M W Feldman; M E Delany; C A Conley; V M Fowler; S B Hedges; R Godbout; S Katyal; C Smith; Q Hudson; A Sinclair; S Mizuno
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Integrative mapping analysis of chicken microchromosome 16 organization.

Authors:  Romain Solinhac; Sophie Leroux; Svetlana Galkina; Olympe Chazara; Katia Feve; Florence Vignoles; Mireille Morisson; Svetlana Derjusheva; Bertrand Bed'hom; Alain Vignal; Valérie Fillon; Frédérique Pitel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Comparative genomics in chicken and Pekin duck using FISH mapping and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin M Skinner; Lindsay B W Robertson; Helen G Tempest; Elizabeth J Langley; Dimitris Ioannou; Katie E Fowler; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Anthony D Hall; Darren K Griffin; Martin Völker
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Whole genome comparative studies between chicken and turkey and their implications for avian genome evolution.

Authors:  Darren K Griffin; Lindsay B Robertson; Helen G Tempest; Alain Vignal; Valérie Fillon; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen; Svetlana Deryusheva; Elena Gaginskaya; Wilfrid Carré; David Waddington; Richard Talbot; Martin Völker; Julio S Masabanda; Dave W Burt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  16 in total

1.  Three-dimensional architecture of tandem repeats in chicken interphase nucleus.

Authors:  Antonina Maslova; Anna Zlotina; Nadezhda Kosyakova; Marina Sidorova; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Heterochromatic regions in Japanese quail chromosomes: comprehensive molecular-cytogenetic characterization and 3D mapping in interphase nucleus.

Authors:  Anna Zlotina; Antonina Maslova; Nadezda Kosyakova; Ahmed B Hamid Al-Rikabi; Thomas Liehr; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  But where did the centromeres go in the chicken genome models?

Authors:  Benoît Piégu; Peter Arensburger; Florian Guillou; Yves Bigot
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  High-resolution mapping and transcriptional activity analysis of chicken centromere sequences on giant lampbrush chromosomes.

Authors:  Alla Krasikova; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Anna Zlotina
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Three-dimensional organisation of RNA-processing machinery in avian growing oocyte nucleus.

Authors:  Alla Krasikova; Tatiana Khodyuchenko; Antonina Maslova; Elena Vasilevskaya
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Comparison of the somatic TADs and lampbrush chromomere-loop complexes in transcriptionally active prophase I oocytes.

Authors:  Tatiana Kulikova; Antonina Maslova; Polina Starshova; Juan Sebastian Rodriguez Ramos; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.919

7.  Microdissection of lampbrush chromosomes as an approach for generation of locus-specific FISH-probes and samples for high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Anna Zlotina; Tatiana Kulikova; Nadezda Kosyakova; Thomas Liehr; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Broad-scale recombination pattern in the primitive bird Rhea americana (Ratites, Palaeognathae).

Authors:  Lucía Del Priore; María Inés Pigozzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multidirectional chromosome painting in Synallaxis frontalis (Passeriformes, Furnariidae) reveals high chromosomal reorganization, involving fissions and inversions.

Authors:  Rafael Kretschmer; Vanusa Lilian Camargo de Lima; Marcelo Santos de Souza; Alice Lemos Costa; Patricia C M O'Brien; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira; Ricardo José Gunski; Analía Del Valle Garnero
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 10.  Amphibian and Avian Karyotype Evolution: Insights from Lampbrush Chromosome Studies.

Authors:  Anna Zlotina; Dmitry Dedukh; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.