Literature DB >> 20016153

Satellite DNA in the karyotype evolution of domestic animals--clinical considerations.

F Adega1, H Guedes-Pinto, R Chaves.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes contain far more DNA than needed for coding proteins. Some of these additional DNA sequences comprise non-coding repetitive DNA sequences, mostly satellite DNAs and also transposable elements usually located at the heterochromatic regions of chromosomes. Satellite DNAs consist of tandemly repeated DNA sequences inhabiting the mammalian genome, typically organized in long arrays of hundreds or thousands of copies. Different important functions have been ascribed to satellite DNA, from the imperative centromeric function in mitosis and meiosis to the recent discovery of its involvement in regulatory functions via satellite transcripts. Moreover, satellite DNAs, among other repetitive sequences, are believed to be the 'engine' triggering mammalian genome evolution. Repetitive DNAs are, most likely, the genetic factors responsible for promoting genomic plasticity and therefore higher rates of chromosome mutation. Furthermore, constitutive heterochromatin regions are thought to be 'hotspots' for structural chromosome rearrangements. A considerable collection of evidences places these sequences in the landscape of mammalian evolution. However, the mechanisms that could explain how this alliance between chromosome evolution and satellite DNA is made are still enigmatic and subject of debate. Throughout the mammalian taxa, different patterns of chromosome evolution have been widely registered from heterochromatin additions/eliminations, Robertsonian translocations, whole-arm reciprocal translocations to tandem translocations; the fact is genome's repetitive fraction is playing a central role in mammalian genome structuring. Throughout this review we will focus on the evidences that associate satellite DNAs and constitutive heterochromatin to the process of chromosome evolution and consequently to domestic species genome's remodeling. (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016153     DOI: 10.1159/000245903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  18 in total

1.  Association between simple sequence repeat-rich chromosome regions and intergenomic translocation breakpoints in natural populations of allopolyploid wild wheats.

Authors:  István Molnár; Marta Cifuentes; Annamária Schneider; Elena Benavente; Márta Molnár-Láng
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Evolution of the structure and composition of house mouse satellite DNA sequences in the subgenus Mus (Rodentia: Muridea): a cytogenomic approach.

Authors:  B Cazaux; J Catalan; F Justy; C Escudé; E Desmarais; J Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Satellite non-coding RNAs: the emerging players in cells, cellular pathways and cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Ferreira; Susana Meles; Ana Escudeiro; Ana Mendes-da-Silva; Filomena Adega; Raquel Chaves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  LINE-1 retrotransposons: from 'parasite' sequences to functional elements.

Authors:  Ana Paço; Filomena Adega; Raquel Chaves
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Centromere positions in chicken and Japanese quail chromosomes: de novo centromere formation versus pericentric inversions.

Authors:  Anna Zlotina; Svetlana Galkina; Alla Krasikova; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen; Elena Gaginskaya; Svetlana Deryusheva
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  A paradox revealed: karyotype evolution in the four-horned antelope occurs by tandem fusion (Mammalia, Bovidae, Tetracerus quadricornis).

Authors:  Anne Ropiquet; Alexandre Hassanin; Eva Pagacova; Michèle Gerbault-Seureau; Halina Cernohorska; Svatka Kubickova; Céline Bonillo; Jiri Rubes; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  The puzzling character of repetitive DNA in Phodopus genomes (Cricetidae, Rodentia).

Authors:  Ana Paço; Filomena Adega; Nevenka Meštrović; Miroslav Plohl; Raquel Chaves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  The Robertsonian phenomenon in the house mouse: mutation, meiosis and speciation.

Authors:  Silvia Garagna; Jesus Page; Raul Fernandez-Donoso; Maurizio Zuccotti; Jeremy B Searle
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Analysis of the Robertsonian (1;29) fusion in Bovinae reveals a common mechanism: insights into its clinical occurrence and chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  A Escudeiro; F Adega; T J Robinson; J S Heslop-Harrison; R Chaves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.