Literature DB >> 16132879

[On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].

M Ptok1, C Schwemmle, C Iven, M Jessen, T Nawka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For routine clinical purposes, dysphonic voices are assessed perceptually using the GRBAS scale or analogues. For clinical application, the crucial question is the interrater reliability (IRR) of the auditory perceptual assessment of voice quality. Therefore, the IRR of the four point RBH (roughness, breathiness, hoarseness vs overall grade) scale was studied. Other parameters, e.g. validity and intrarater reliability were not considered.
METHODS: A total of 78 patients read a standard text "Der Nordwind und die Sonne". These samples were evaluated by 19 speech and voice therapy students according to the degree of roughness, breathiness and hoarseness. Data were subjected to reliability analysis.
RESULTS: Our data indicate a high IRR with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. No single rating of the 19 raters could be omitted without decreasing the IRR. DISCUSSION: The data indicate that the perceptual assessment of hoarseness for running speech is highly reliable. The application of the RBH scale is suitable for clinical purposes. It should be considered as an outcome measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16132879     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-005-1310-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis.

Authors:  J Revis; A Giovanni; F Wuyts; J Triglia
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  P Carding; E Carlson; R Epstein; L Mathieson; C Shewell
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.487

4.  Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale.

Authors:  Ping Yu; Joana Revis; Floris L Wuyts; Michel Zanaret; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels.

Authors:  Benjamin Halberstam
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].

Authors:  F Núñez Batalla; P Corte Santos; G Sequeiros Santiago; B Señaris González; C Suárez Nieto
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul

7.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

8.  [Hoarseness].

Authors:  R Müller
Journal:  Ther Umsch       Date:  1995-11

9.  Perception of hoarseness by several classes of listeners.

Authors:  L C Anders; H Hollien; P Hurme; A Sonninen; J Wendler
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1988

10.  Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect.

Authors:  P H DeJonckere; L Crevier-Buchman; J P Marie; M Moerman; M Remacle; V Woisard
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2003
View more
  15 in total

1.  [Voice diagnostics in professional sopranos: application of the protocol of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)].

Authors:  M Echternach; S Arndt; M F Zander; B Richter
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Laryngopharyngeal morbidity following general anaesthesia. Anaesthesiological and laryngological aspects].

Authors:  A Reber; L Hauenstein; M Echternach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Laryngeal alterations following endotracheal intubation and use of larynx masks].

Authors:  M Echternach; T Mencke; B Richter; A Reber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Efficacy of microsurgery in Reinke's oedema evaluated by traditional voice assessment integrated with the Vocal Extent Measure (VEM).

Authors:  T Salmen; T Ermakova; A Schindler; S-R Ko; Ö Göktas; M Gross; T Nawka; P P Caffier
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  [The Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects].

Authors:  B Barsties; Y Maryn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Diagnostics and therapy in professional voice-users].

Authors:  B Richter; M Echternach
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Primary injection laryngoplasty after chordectomy for small glottic carcinomas.

Authors:  Axelle Felicio-Briegel; Kariem Sharaf; Frank Haubner; Matthias Echternach
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.

Authors:  Tino Haderlein; Cornelia Schwemmle; Michael Döllinger; Václav Matoušek; Martin Ptok; Elmar Nöth
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  Diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls in benign vocal fold diseases.

Authors:  Jörg Bohlender
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

10.  A modified false vocal fold flap for functional reconstruction after frontolateral partial laryngectomy: a comparison with conventional open resection and laser cordectomy.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; Roland Kohnle; Heinz Maier
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.