Literature DB >> 25531738

The Americleft Speech Project: A Training and Reliability Study.

Kathy L Chapman, Adriane Baylis, Judith Trost-Cardamone, Kelly Nett Cordero, Angela Dixon, Cindy Dobbelsteyn, Anna Thurmes, Kristina Wilson, Anne Harding-Bell, Triona Sweeney, Gregory Stoddard, Debbie Sell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of two reliability studies and to assess the effect of training on interrater reliability scores.
DESIGN: The first study (1) examined interrater and intrarater reliability scores (weighted and unweighted kappas) and (2) compared interrater reliability scores before and after training on the use of the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) with British English-speaking children. The second study examined interrater and intrarater reliability on a modified version of the CAPS-A (CAPS-A Americleft Modification) with American and Canadian English-speaking children. Finally, comparisons were made between the interrater and intrarater reliability scores obtained for Study 1 and Study 2. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were speech-language pathologists from the Americleft Speech Project.
RESULTS: In Study 1, interrater reliability scores improved for 6 of the 13 parameters following training on the CAPS-A protocol. Comparison of the reliability results for the two studies indicated lower scores for Study 2 compared with Study 1. However, this appeared to be an artifact of the kappa statistic that occurred due to insufficient variability in the reliability samples for Study 2. When percent agreement scores were also calculated, the ratings appeared similar across Study 1 and Study 2.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggested that improvements in interrater reliability could be obtained following a program of systematic training. However, improvements were not uniform across all parameters. Acceptable levels of reliability were achieved for those parameters most important for evaluation of velopharyngeal function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americleft; cleft palate; listener agreement; listener reliability; perceptual ratings; speech outcome; training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25531738      PMCID: PMC5693235          DOI: 10.1597/14-027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  72 in total

1.  A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.

Authors:  R I Zraick; J M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Individual and consensus judgments of disfluency types in the speech of persons who stutter.

Authors:  A K Cordes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

4.  The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Carolyn R Baylor
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  A methodological study of factors affecting the judgment of misarticulated /s/.

Authors:  M I Stephens; R Daniloff
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Reliability of listener transcriptions of compensatory articulations.

Authors:  J L Gooch; M Hardin-Jones; K L Chapman; J E Trost-Cardamone; J Sussman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2001-01

7.  Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom--the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3: speech outcomes.

Authors:  D Sell; P Grunwell; S Mildinhall; T Murphy; T A Cornish; D Bearn; W C Shaw; J J Murray; A C Williams; J R Sandy
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2001-01

8.  Reliability and dispersion of nasality ratings.

Authors:  D T Counihan; W L Cullinan
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1970-01

Review 9.  The reliability of observational data: II. Issues in the identification and measurement of stuttering events.

Authors:  A K Cordes; R J Ingham
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04

10.  Effect of listener training on perceptual judgement of hypernasality.

Authors:  Alice Lee; Tara L Whitehill; Valter Ciocca
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.346

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Effectiveness of Palate Re-Repair for Treating Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicole M Kurnik; Erica M Weidler; Kari M Lien; Kelly N Cordero; Jessica L Williams; M'hamed Temkit; Stephen P Beals; Davinder J Singh; Thomas J Sitzman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  Robust Estimation of Hypernasality in Dysarthria with Acoustic Model Likelihood Features.

Authors:  Michael Saxon; Ayush Tripathi; Yishan Jiao; Julie Liss; Visar Berisha
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  Alveolar Backing in 3-Year-Old Children with and without Repaired Cleft Palate: Preliminary Findings Related to Cleft Type and History of Otitis Media.

Authors:  David J Zajac; Hannah Whitt; Adriane Baylis; Maura Tourian; Katie Garcia
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Auditory-Perceptual Features of Speech in Children and Adults With Down Syndrome: A Speech Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Raymond D Kent; Julie Eichhorn; Erin M Wilson; Youmi Suk; Daniel M Bolt; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Assessment of Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Vikram C Mathad; Nancy Scherer; Kathy Chapman; Julie M Liss; Visar Berisha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.756

6.  Estimates of the Prevalence of Speech and Motor Speech Disorders in Youth With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Authors:  Adriane L Baylis; Lawrence D Shriberg
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Protocols for Reporting Speech Outcomes following Palatoplasty or Velopharyngeal Surgery: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Ann W Kummer; Hedieh Hashemi Hosseinabad; Erin Redle; Stacey Clark
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-02-08

8.  Square-root Palatoplasty: Comparing a Novel Modified-Furlow Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty Technique to Traditional Straight-line Repair.

Authors:  Shoichiro A Tanaka; Demetrius M Coombs; Fatma B Tuncer; Alexander Shikhman; Patricia Keenan; Neil L McNinch; Ananth S Murthy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-19

9.  The Cleft Care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes.

Authors:  D Sell; S Mildinhall; L Albery; A K Wills; J R Sandy; A R Ness
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Management of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Patients With and Without Multidisciplinary Team Care.

Authors:  Vanessa Torrecillas; Sarah Hatch Pollard; Hilary McCrary; Helene M Taylor; Alexandra Palmer; Jeremy Meier; Harlan Muntz; Jonathan R Skirko
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-10-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.