| Literature DB >> 23139889 |
Abstract
Aphid species within the genus Tuberculatus Mordvilko (Hemiptera: Aphididae) exhibit a variety of interactions with ants, ranging from close associations to non-attendance. A previous study indicated that despite wing possession, ant-attended Tuberculatus species exhibited low dispersal rates compared with non-attended species. This study examined if presence or absence of mutualistic interactions and habitat continuity of host plants affected intraspecific genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences. Sympatric ant-attended Tuberculatus quercicola (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and non-attended Tuberculatus paiki Hille Ris Lambers (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were collected from the daimyo oak Quercus dentata Thunberg (Fagales: Fagaceae) in Japan and examined for haplotype variability. Seventeen haplotypes were identified in 568 T. quercicola individuals representing 23 populations and seven haplotypes in 425 T. paiki representing 19 populations. Haplotype diversity, which indicates the mean number of differences between all pairs of haplotypes in the sample, and nucleotide diversity were higher in T. quercicola than T. paiki. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed higher genetic differentiation among populations within groups of T. quercicola (39.8%) than T. paiki (22.6%). The effects of attendant ant species on genetic differentiation in T. quercicola were not distinguishable from geographic factors. Despite low dispersal rates, host plant habitat continuity might facilitate widespread dispersal of a T. quercicola haplotype in Hokkaido. These results suggested that following T. quercicola colonization, gene flow among populations was limited, resulting in genetic drift within populations. However, frequent T. paiki dispersal is clearly evident by low genetic differentiation among populations within groups, resulting in lower haplotype diversity.Entities:
Keywords: Aphid-ant mutualisms; COI; Quercus dentata; Tuberculatus aphids; haplotype diversity; outgroup heteroduplex
Year: 2012 PMID: 23139889 PMCID: PMC3488681 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Ant-attended aphid (a) Tuberculatus quercicola and non-attended aphid (b) Tuberculatus paiki.
Collection data for Tuberculatus quercicola and Tuberculatus paiki. N indicates the number of aphids used in genotyping
| Island | Region Group | Population | Haplotype | Ants | Population | Haplotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hokkaido | Hokkaido | 1 | Teshio | 20 | H1 | Fy | 1 | Saroma | 20 | H1 |
| 2 | Tomamae | 28 | H2, 3 | Fy, Fj | 2 | Obihiro | 20 | H1 | ||
| 3 | Obihiro | 20 | H6 | Lj | 3 | Ishikari | 42 | H1 | ||
| 4 | Churui | 32 | H2 | Fy | 4 | Mukawa | 22 | H1 | ||
| 5 | Ishikari | 40 | H2 | Fy | 5 | Esan | 40 | H1 | ||
| 6 | Oshoro | 24 | H2 | Fy | ||||||
| 7 | Erimo | 16 | H2 | Ff, Lj | ||||||
| 8 | Mukawa | 32 | H2, 4 | Lj | ||||||
| 9 | Esan | 32 | H7 | Lj | ||||||
| Honshu | Tohoku | 10 | Syariki | 40 | H8 | Lj | 6 | Syariki | 36 | H1, 2 |
| 11 | Nyudozaki | 24 | H5 | Pp | 7 | Shichinohe | 20 | H1, 2, 5 | ||
| 12 | Kisakata | 24 | H7 | Lj | 8 | Iwaki | 16 | H1 | ||
| 9 | Misaki | 8 | H1 | |||||||
| Kanto | 13 | Kashiwa | 16 | H7 | Ls | 10 | Hadano | 18 | H1 | |
| Chubu | 14 | Kashiwazaki | 24 | H9 | Pp, Lj | 11 | Wajima | 20 | H1 | |
| 15 | Iwagasaki | 10 | H9 | Pp | ||||||
| 16 | Iwamuro | 16 | H10 | Ct | ||||||
| 17 | Oshimizu | 30 | H9 | Lj | ||||||
| 18 | Matsumoto | 12 | H11 | Lj | ||||||
| Kinki | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | Kasumi | 6 | H3 | |
| Chugoku | 19 | Aoya | 18 | H12 | Pp | 13 | Kawakamison | 11 | H1 | |
| 20 | Daisen | 14 | H12 | Lj | 14 | Daisen | 33 | H3 | ||
| 21 | Kawakamison | 24 | H12 | Lj | 15 | Unnan | 24 | H3, 7 | ||
| 16 | Geihoku | 16 | H3 | |||||||
| Kyushu | Kyushu | 22 | Yufudake | 26 | H13, 14 | Cj | 17 | Sasaguri | 32 | H4, 6 |
| 23 | Kokonoe | 46 | H15, 16, 17 | Lj | 18 | Yufudake | 13 | H4 | ||
| 19 | Kokonoe | 28 | H4, 6 | |||||||
| Total | 568 | 425 | ||||||||
Major island in Japan divided by a strait.
Attendant ant species.
Cj, Camponotus japonicus; Cr, Crematogaster teranishii; Ff, Formica fukaii; Fj, Formica japonica; Fy, Formica yessensis; Lj, Lasius japonicus; Ls, Lasius sakagamii; Pp, Pristomyrmex punctatus.
Figure 2Haplotype distribution of (a) Tuberculatus quercicola and (c) Tuberculatus paiki. Number in the pie chart and N indicate haplotype code and sample size, respectively. Numbers in the map designate collection sites shown in Table 1. Bold lines indicate group boundaries. Diagrams at right show relationships between species haplotypes (b) T. quercicola and (d) T. paiki.
Genetic diversity of Tuberculatus quercicola and Tuberculatus paiki. Haplotype diversity indicates an estimation and its sampling variance. Mean number of pairwise differences indicates mean number of differences between all pairs of haplotypes in the sample and total variance. Nucleotide diversity (π) indicates the probability that two randomly chosen homologous nucleotides are different and its variance. Mutation rate (θ (S)) indicates an estimate of the scaled mutation rate determined from the number of segregating sites in a sample of DNA sequences
| No. haplotypes | No. polymorphic sites | Haplotype diversity | Mean number of pairwise differences | Nucleotide diversity (π) | Mutation rate ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 19 | 0.86±0.01 | 3.5±1.79 | 0.004±0.0023 | 2.75±0.8 | |
| 7 | 9 | 0.58±0.02 | 1.05±0.7 | 0.0012±0.0009 | 1.36±0.51 |
Figure 3Mismatch distributions with Tajima's D values for Tuberculatus quercicola populations in (a) Hokkaido, (b) Honshu, (c) Kyushu, and (d) Japan; and for Tuberculatus paiki populations in (e) Honshu, (f) Kyushu, and (g) Japan. Gray bars and open circles indicate observed mismatch and model frequency.
Analysis of molecular variance for Tuberculatus quercicola and Tuberculatus paiki
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance of components | Percentage of variation | Fixation indices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geographic subdivision for | ||||||
| Among groups | 5 | 614.71 | 1.21 | 57.44 | FCT = 0.57436 | 0.0001 |
| Among populations within groups | 17 | 345.94 | 0.84 | 39.8 | FSC = 0.93496 | 0.0001 |
| Within populations | 545 | 31.76 | 0.06 | 2.77 | FST = 0.97232 | 0.0001 |
| Total | 567 | 992.40 | 2.10 | |||
| Ant species subdivision for | ||||||
| Among ant genus | 4 | 287.68 | 0.65 | 32.03 | FCT = 0.32030 | 0.00196 |
| Among ant species within ant genus | 2 | 10.90 | 0.14 | 7.03 | FSC = 0.10341 | 0.0001 |
| Within ant species | 561 | 693.83 | 1.24 | 60.94 | FST = 0.39059 | 0.0001 |
| Total | 567 | 992.40 | 2.03 | |||
| Geographic subdivision for | ||||||
| Among groups | 6 | 121.32 | 0.31 | 54.16 | FCT = 0.54159 | 0.001 |
| Among populations within groups | 12 | 37.31 | 0.13 | 22.55 | FSC = 0.49202 | 0.0001 |
| Within populations | 406 | 54.97 | 0.14 | 23.29 | FST = 0.76714 | 0.0001 |
| Total | 424 | 213.60 | 0.58 | |||
Figure 4Phylogenetic trees derived from haplotypes in (a) Tuberculatus quercicola and (b) Tuberculatus paiki obtained from the Bayesian analysis method. Probabilities >0.5 are shown below or near the branches. Bold lines in (a) indicate clades (C1, C2, and C3) that form monophyletic groups. Rectangles indicate the geographic areas where each haplotype was collected: white, gray, and black correspond to Hokkaido, Honshu, and Kyushu, respectively.