Literature DB >> 16979502

Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.

Gwen R J Swennen1, Filip Schutyser.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial imaging techniques are becoming increasingly popular and have opened new possibilities for orthodontic assessment, treatment, and follow-up. Recently, a new 3D cephalometric method based on spiral multi-slice (MS) computed tomography (CT) was developed and validated by our research group. This innovative 3D virtual approach is a bridge between conventional cephalometry and modern craniofacial imaging techniques and provides high-quality, accurate, and reliable quantitative 3D data. The aim of this article was to describe the advantages and the disadvantages of spiral MS-CT 3D cephalometry and to discuss the potential of cone-beam CT 3D cephalometry.

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16979502     DOI： 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN： 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  55 in total

1.  Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.

Authors:  G S Liedke; E L Delamare; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J R Prietsch; V Dutra; H E D da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  3D cephalometric analysis obtained from computed tomography. Review of the literature.

Authors:  Giulia Rossini; Costanza Cavallini; Michele Cassetta; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-27

3.  An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.

Authors:  P Pittayapat; D Galiti; Y Huang; K Dreesen; M Schreurs; P Couto Souza; I R F Rubira-Bullen; F H Westphalen; R Pauwels; G Kalema; G Willems; R Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction.

Authors:  Feifei Jiang; Sean S-Y Liu; Zeyang Xia; Shuning Li; Jie Chen; Katherine S Kula; George Eckert
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Francine Kühl Panzarella; J L C Junqueira; L B Oliveira; N S de Araújo; C Costa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Elcio Marcantonio; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jürgen Medelnik; Klaus Hertrich; Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Ursula Hirschfelder; Elisabeth Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning.

Authors:  Peng Yuan; Huaming Mai; Jianfu Li; Dennis Chun-Yu Ho; Yingying Lai; Siting Liu; Daeseung Kim; Zixiang Xiong; David M Alfi; John F Teichgraeber; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.924
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.