Literature DB >> 15877045

From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Demetrios J Halazonetis1.   

Abstract

Computed tomography is entering the orthodontic specialty as a mainstream diagnostic modality. Radiation exposure and cost have decreased significantly, and the diagnostic value is very high compared with traditional radiographic options. However, 3-dimensional data present new challenges and need a different approach from traditional viewing of static images to make the most of the available possibilities. Advances in computer hardware and software now enable interactive display of the data on personal computers, with the ability to selectively view soft or hard tissues from any angle. Transfer functions are used to apply transparency and color. Cephalometric measurements can be taken by digitizing points in 3-dimensional coordinates. Application of 3-dimensional data is expected to increase significantly soon and might eventually replace many conventional orthodontic records that are in use today.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877045     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.

Authors:  S Varghese; V Kailasam; S Padmanabhan; B Vikraman; A Chithranjan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A computed tomography-based comparative cephalometric analysis of the Italian craniofacial pattern through 2,700 years.

Authors:  S Cappabianca; L Perillo; V Esposito; F Iaselli; G Tufano; T G Thanassoulas; M Montemarano; R Grassi; A Rotondo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Calculating nasoseptal flap dimensions: a cadaveric study using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ellen Ten Dam; Astrid G W Korsten-Meijer; Rutger H Schepers; Wicher J van der Meer; Peter O Gerrits; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Robert A Feijen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction: a comparison between 2D, 3D CT and original anatomical structures.

Authors:  Eldho Markose; B Vikraman; M Veerabahu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-06-10

6.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Pil-Kyo Jung; Gung-Chol Lee; Cheol-Hyun Moon
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Ana E F Oliveira; Alexandre Motta; Ceib Phillips; Brandon Burke; Donald Tyndall
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models.

Authors:  Willem P Engelbrecht; Zacharias Fourie; Janalt Damstra; Peter O Gerrits; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses.

Authors:  Ricardo de Lima Navarro; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Giovani Fidelis de Oliveira; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.