Literature DB >> 23139048

Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Yoshito Akagi1, Tetsushi Kinugasa, Kazuo Shirouzu.   

Abstract

Radical surgical treatment for very low rectal cancer near the anus has generally involved abdominoperineal resection. Various sphincter-saving operations have been developed for such tumors to optimize the patients' postoperative quality of life. Current protocols focus on intersphincteric resection (ISR), which differs from conventional hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA) after low anterior resection. However, the efficacy of ISR remains unclear. The surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes after intersphincteric resection (ISR) were reviewed. This review of the current literature was conducted by searching the PubMed online database. Articles focusing specifically on conventional hand-sewn CAA were excluded from this study. The mean mortality rate is <2 %, and the mean morbidity rate ranges from 7.7 to 38.3 %. The mean local recurrence rate varies widely from 0 to 22.7 %, with a mean follow-up duration of 40-94 months. The mean disease-free and overall 5-year survival rates are 69-86 and 79-97 months, respectively. Functional outcomes are generally acceptable, but accurate evaluation is extremely difficult due to the absence of unified appraisal methods. ISR appears surgically, oncologically and functionally acceptable. However, more experience and better understanding of the oncology, anal physiology, and pelvic anatomy are necessary to achieve successful outcomes without complications, and to improve patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23139048     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0394-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  63 in total

1.  Graciloplasty for internal and external sphincteric resection of lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasumi Araki; Kazuya Momosaki; Yasuhiro Nozoe; Katsumi Hayashi; Katsuhiro Yamada; Masamitsu Kanazawa; Akemi Inoue; Toshihiro Noake; Masahiro Takano; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Kurume Med J       Date:  2004

2.  Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy?

Authors:  K Renner; H R Rosen; G Novi; N Hölbling; R Schiessel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials.

Authors:  M Urban; H R Rosen; N Hölbling; W Feil; G Hochwarther; W Hruby; R Schiessel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience.

Authors:  Norio Saito; Yoshihiro Moriya; Kazuo Shirouzu; Koutarou Maeda; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Keiji Koda; Takashi Hirai; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome.

Authors:  R G H Beets-Tan; T Lettinga; G L Beets
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal and anterior resection.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent; J Carles; J Saric; P Michel; M Parneix
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  Y Nagamatsu; K Shirouzu; H Isomoto; Y Ogata; I Tsuchida; Y Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Jia Gang Han; Guang Hui Wei; Zhi Gang Gao; Yi Zheng; Zhen Jun Wang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W O Kirwan; R B Turnbull; V W Fazio; F L Weakley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Reza Chamlou; Yann Parc; Tabassome Simon; Malika Bennis; Nidal Dehni; Rolland Parc; Emmanuel Tiret
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  Technical tips for intersphincteric resection: how to take out the rectum.

Authors:  Yoshito Akagi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Yousuke Oka; Tomoaki Mizobe; Takefumi Yoshida; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok-B Lim; Chan W Kim; In J Park; Yong S Yoon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The influence of specific technical maneuvers utilized in the creation of diverting loop-ileostomies on stoma-related morbidity.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Masataka Ikeda; Masaki Tujie; Junichi Hasegawa; Masayuki Ohue; Takeshi Kato; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Ke Zhao; Quanlong Liu; Shuhui Yin; Guangzuan Zhuo; Yujuan Zhao; Jun Zhu; Jianhua Ding
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Intersphincteric Resection-Results from a Tertiary Cancer Center in India.

Authors:  Vishwas D Pai; Pavan Sugoor; Prachi S Patil; Vikas Ostwal; Reena Engineer; Supreeta Arya; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21

7.  A comparison of the long-term anorectal function between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Koya Hida; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Cheon Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Abdulrahman Muaod Alotaibi; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; In Ja Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Nikoletta Dimitriou; Othon Michail; Dimitrios Moris; John Griniatsos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-07-15

10.  External sphincter resection for lower rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma: achieving anal preservation with oncological and functional satisfaction.

Authors:  Yoshito Akagi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Yousuke Oka; Tomoaki Mizobe; Takefumi Yoshida; Kotaro Yuge; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.