Literature DB >> 18043092

Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Reza Chamlou1, Yann Parc, Tabassome Simon, Malika Bennis, Nidal Dehni, Rolland Parc, Emmanuel Tiret.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of very low rectal cancer, a distal resection margin of more than 1 cm can be obtained by partial internal sphincteric resection, allowing a sphincter preserving surgery. Thus, intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been proposed as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for selected low rectal cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the morbidity, mortality, and the long-term oncologic and functional results of ISR.
METHODS: Charts of patients who had ISR between 1992 and 2004 were reviewed. Cancer-related survival and locoregional recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcome was assessed by using a standardized gastrointestinal functional questionnaire. Incontinence was assessed by the continence score of Wexner.
RESULTS: Ninety patients (59 males, 31 females) with a tumor at a median distance of 35 mm (range, 22-52) from the anal verge had an ISR. Thirty-seven patients (41%) had preoperative radiotherapy. Histologically complete remission after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (ypT0) was observed in 7 patients (8%), 12 patients (13%) were pT1, 35 patients (39%) pT2, 32 patients (36%) pT3, and 4 patients (4%) pT4. Five patients (5.5%) had synchronous liver metastases. R0 resection was obtained in 85 patients (94.4%). The median distal resection margin on the fixed specimen was 12 mm (range, 5-35) and was positive in 1 case. The circumferential margin was positive (< or =1 mm) in 4 patients (4.4%). There was no mortality. Complication rate was 18.8%: anastomotic leakage occurred in 8 patients (8.8%) and 1 patient had an anovaginal fistula. Five patients (5.6%) underwent secondary abdominoperineal resection: 1 for positive distal margin, 1 for colonic J-pouch necrosis, and 3 for local recurrence. ONCOLOGIC
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 56.2 months (range, 13.3-168.4), local, distant, and combined recurrence occurred in 6 (6.6%), 8 (8.8%), and 2 patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (14.4%) died of cancer recurrence. Five-year overall and disease-free survival was 82% (80-97) and 75% (64-86), respectively. In univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly influenced by pTNM stage and T stage (pT 1-2 vs. 3-4: P = 0.008 and stage I-II vs. III-IV: P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, we did not find any impact on local recurrence-free survival for the investigated prognostic variables. FUNCTIONAL
RESULTS: For a total of 83 patients the mean stool frequency was 2.3 +/- 1.3 per 24 hours. Forty-one percent of patients had stool fragmentation, one-third nocturnal defecation, 19% fecal urgency, and 36% followed low fiber diet. Thirty-four patients (41%) were fully continent, 29 patients (35%) had minor continence problems, and 20 patients (24%) were incontinent. After adjustment for age, gender, tumor level, and pTNM stage, preoperative radiotherapy was the only factor associated with a risk of fecal incontinence [OR (IC 95%) = 3.1 (1.0-9.0), P = 0.04].
CONCLUSION: In selected patients, ISR is a safe operation with good oncologic results. It achieves good functional results in 76% of patients. Functional results are significantly altered by preoperative radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18043092     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c29ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  53 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Michio Itabashi; Shingo Kameoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Hashimoto; Hiroyuki Shiokawa; Kimihiko Funahashi; Norio Saito; Toshio Sawada; Kazuo Shirouzu; Kazutaka Yamada; Kenichi Sugihara; Toshiaki Watanabe; Akira Sugita; Akira Tsunoda; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Tatsuo Teramoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

5.  Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Seok-B Lim; Yong S Yoon; In J Park; Chan W Kim; Chang N Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

7.  Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; Yen-Kuang Lin; Chun-Chao Chang; Cheng-Jeng Tai; Jeng-Fong Chiou; Yu-Jia Chang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; James Chi-Yong Ngu; Yan-Jiun Huang; Yen-Kuang Lin; Chia-Che Chen; Yiu-Shun Tong; Szu-Chia Huang; Chia-Chen Hu; Shu-Hwa Tan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Differences in tissue degeneration between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Nishizawa; Satoshi Fujii; Norio Saito; Masaaki Ito; Kentaro Nakajima; Atsushi Ochiai; Masanori Sugito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yuji Nishizawa; Masaaki Ito; Norio Saito; Takanori Suzuki; Masanori Sugito; Toshiyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.