| Literature DB >> 24817058 |
Yoshito Akagi1, Tetsushi Kinugasa, Yousuke Oka, Tomoaki Mizobe, Takefumi Yoshida, Kotaro Yuge, Kazuo Shirouzu.
Abstract
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) has recently been performed for very low rectal cancer, whereas abdominoperineal resection (APR) is typically reserved for cancers extremely close to the anal verge and/or when the depth of tumor invasion is suspected to involve the intersphincteric space. This is because impairment of anal function is considered unavoidable if the external sphincter (ES) is excised. We describe our technique of ISR with ES resection and discuss its outcomes. This surgical technique may offer major clinical advantages to selected patients and should be considered as an alternative to APR, although careful consideration of anal function is required.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24817058 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0903-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Today ISSN: 0941-1291 Impact factor: 2.549