Literature DB >> 23138521

Stimulus-response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss.

Benjamin A Philip1, Scott H Frey.   

Abstract

Previous findings show an advantage in response speed when stimulus and response correspond spatially (i.e., the Simon effect). Chronic unilateral amputees show altered spatial perception near their affected hand, providing an opportunity to investigate whether experience also affects the visuomotor stimulus-response (S-R) mapping that underlies the Simon effect. We used a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm to probe the spatial correspondence between visual cues and responses, in 14 unilateral upper limb amputees and 14 matched controls. We presented visual stimuli in 5 different locations within peripersonal space, including the midline, and found a smooth gradient of S-R correspondence effects. This is consistent with the hypothesis that S-R correspondence is represented along a spatial gradient. Unilateral amputees performed indistinguishably from matched controls, regardless of whether stimuli appeared in the hemispace ipsi- or contralateral to their missing limbs. This is inconsistent with the hypothesis that experience-dependent visual distortions entail changes in the S-R mapping; alternatively, it could reflect a complete experience independence of the Simon effect. We propose that the affordance competition hypothesis (Cisek in Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1585-1599, 2007) explains the Simon effect and the underlying gradient of S-R correspondence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23138521     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3317-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain?

Authors:  M Lotze; W Grodd; N Birbaumer; M Erb; E Huse; H Flor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task.

Authors:  E Wascher; U Schatz; T Kuder; R Verleger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The components of visual attention and the ubiquitous Simon effect.

Authors:  Raymond M Klein; Jason Ivanoff
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-09-29

5.  Splitting visual space with attention.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltá
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.

Authors:  J R Simon; K Berbaum
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-03

8.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Hand dominance, attention, and the choice between responses.

Authors:  P Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.

Authors:  Meytal Wilf; Nicholas P Holmes; Isabella Schwartz; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-04

Review 2.  Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  How we remember what we can do.

Authors:  Gunnar Declerck
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.