Literature DB >> 23136349

Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

I Ronga1, E Valentini, A Mouraux, G D Iannetti.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by transient nociceptive stimuli in humans are largely sensitive to bottom-up novelty induced, for example, by changes in stimulus attributes (e.g., modality or spatial location) within a stream of repeated stimuli. Here we aimed 1) to test the contribution of a selective change of the intensity of a repeated stimulus in determining the magnitude of nociceptive ERPs, and 2) to dissect the effect of this change of intensity in terms of "novelty" and "saliency" (an increase of stimulus intensity is more salient than a decrease of stimulus intensity). Nociceptive ERPs were elicited by trains of three consecutive laser stimuli (S1-S2-S3) delivered to the hand dorsum at a constant 1-s interstimulus interval. Three, equally spaced intensities were used: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). While the intensities of S1 and S2 were always identical (L, M, or H), the intensity of S3 was either identical (e.g., HHH) or different (e.g., MMH) from the intensity of S1 and S2. Introducing a selective change in stimulus intensity elicited significantly larger N1 and N2 waves of the S3-ERP but only when the change consisted in an increase in stimulus intensity. This observation indicates that nociceptive ERPs do not simply reflect processes involved in the detection of novelty but, instead, are mainly determined by stimulus saliency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136349      PMCID: PMC3567386          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00464.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Thorsten Horenkamp; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Stimulus novelty, and not neural refractoriness, explains the repetition suppression of laser-evoked potentials.

Authors:  A L Wang; A Mouraux; M Liang; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial discrimination thresholds for pain and touch in human hairy skin.

Authors:  T Schlereth; W Magerl; R Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The Neural Basis of Selective Attention: Cortical Sources and Targets of Attentional Modulation.

Authors:  Steven Yantis
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2008

6.  Habituation and dishabituation of the human vertex response.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-04

Review 7.  Auditory deviance detection revisited: evidence for a hierarchical novelty system.

Authors:  Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix".

Authors:  André Mouraux; Ana Diukova; Michael C Lee; Richard G Wise; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Involuntary orienting of attention to nociceptive events: neural and behavioral signatures.

Authors:  Valéry Legrain; Caroline Perchet; Luis García-Larrea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Bypassing primary sensory cortices--a direct thalamocortical pathway for transmitting salient sensory information.

Authors:  M Liang; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  30 in total

1.  Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A novel dual-wavelength laser stimulator to elicit transient and tonic nociceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Dong; Tianjun Liu; Han Wang; Jichun Yang; Zhuying Chen; Yong Hu; Yingxin Li
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Caloric vestibular stimulation modulates nociceptive evoked potentials.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Patrick Haggard; Gabriella Bottini; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation on laser-evoked pain and brain activity.

Authors:  Benjamin Provencher; Stéphane Northon; Carlos Gevers Montoro; Julie O'Shaughnessy; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Memorisation and implicit perceptual learning are enhanced for preferred musical intervals and chords.

Authors:  Pietro Sarasso; Pasqualina Perna; Paolo Barbieri; Marco Neppi-Modona; Katiuscia Sacco; Irene Ronga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

6.  Attachment style moderates partner presence effects on pain: a laser-evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Charlotte Krahé; Yannis Paloyelis; Heather Condon; Paul M Jenkinson; Steven C R Williams; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control.

Authors:  Paula M Herrera; Mario Speranza; Adam Hampshire; Tristán A Bekinschtein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Thoughts of death modulate psychophysical and cortical responses to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Elia Valentini; Katharina Koch; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cortical responses to salient nociceptive and not nociceptive stimuli in vegetative and minimal conscious state.

Authors:  Marina de Tommaso; Jorge Navarro; Crocifissa Lanzillotti; Katia Ricci; Francesca Buonocunto; Paolo Livrea; Giulio E Lancioni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cortical Responsiveness to Nociceptive Stimuli in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Do C-Fiber Laser Evoked Potentials Have a Role?

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Antonino Leo; Carmela Rifici; Patrizia Pollicino; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.