Literature DB >> 34279670

Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.

Stéphane Northon1,2, Zoha Deldar1,2, Mathieu Piché3,4.   

Abstract

The cerebral integration of somatosensory inputs from multiple sources is essential to produce adapted behaviors. Previous studies suggest that bilateral somatosensory inputs interact differently depending on stimulus characteristics, including their noxious nature. The aim of this study was to clarify how bilateral inputs evoked by noxious laser stimuli, noxious shocks, and innocuous shocks interact in terms of perception and brain responses. The experiment comprised two conditions (right-hand stimulation and concurrent stimulation of both hands) in which painful laser stimuli, painful shocks and non-painful shocks were delivered. Perception, somatosensory-evoked potentials (P45, N100, P260), laser-evoked potentials (N1, N2 and P2) and event-related spectral perturbations (delta to gamma oscillation power) were compared between conditions and stimulus modalities. The amplitude of negative vertex potentials (N2 or N100) and the power of delta/theta oscillations were increased in the bilateral compared with unilateral condition, regardless of the stimulus type (P < 0.01). However, gamma oscillation power increased for painful and non-painful shocks (P < 0.01), but not for painful laser stimuli (P = 0.08). Despite the similarities in terms of brain activity, bilateral inputs interacted differently for painful stimuli, for which perception remained unchanged, and non-painful stimuli, for which perception increased. This may reflect a ceiling effect for the attentional capture by noxious stimuli and warrants further investigations to examine the regulation of such interactions by bottom-up and top-down processes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral; Electroencephalography; Integration; Nociception; Pain; Saliency

Year:  2021        PMID: 34279670     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06175-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  60 in total

1.  Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Robert Dowman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  The interactions between spatial summation and DNIC: effect of the distance between two painful stimuli and attentional factors on pain perception.

Authors:  Ruth Defrin; Irit Tsedek; Inbal Lugasi; Irit Moriles; Gideon Urca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Contralateral tactile masking between forearms.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude.

Authors:  R Dowman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07

6.  Processing of bilateral versus unilateral conditions: evidence for the functional contribution of the ventral attention network.

Authors:  Lena-Alexandra Beume; Christoph P Kaller; Markus Hoeren; Stefan Klöppel; Dorothee Kuemmerer; Volkmar Glauche; Lena Köstering; Irina Mader; Michel Rijntjes; Cornelius Weiller; Roza Umarova
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli.

Authors:  J H Chien; C C Liu; J H Kim; T M Markman; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Catherine Fischer; Julien Besle; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Marie-Helene Giard; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Localization of functional regions of human mesial cortex by somatosensory evoked potential recording and by cortical stimulation.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; M Luby; A Puce; D D Spencer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-03

10.  Neural substrate of concurrent sound perception: direct electrophysiological recordings from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Catherine Fischer; Françoise Bauchet; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spinal and Cerebral Integration of Noxious Inputs in Left-handed Individuals.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.020

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.