Literature DB >> 28528394

A novel dual-wavelength laser stimulator to elicit transient and tonic nociceptive stimulation.

Xiaoxi Dong1, Tianjun Liu1, Han Wang1, Jichun Yang1, Zhuying Chen1, Yong Hu1,2, Yingxin Li3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a new laser stimulator to elicit both transient and sustained heat stimulation with a dual-wavelength laser system as a tool for the investigation of both transient and tonic experimental models of pain. The laser stimulator used a 980-nm pulsed laser to generate transient heat stimulation and a 1940-nm continuous-wave (CW) laser to provide sustained heat stimulation. The laser with 980-nm wavelength can elicit transient pain with less thermal injury, while the 1940-nm CW laser can effectively stimulate both superficial and deep nociceptors to elicit tonic pain. A proportional integral-derivative (PID) temperature feedback control system was implemented to ensure constancy of temperature during heat stimulation. The performance of this stimulator was evaluated by in vitro and in vivo animal experiments. In vitro experiments on totally 120 specimens fresh pig skin included transient heat stimulation by 980-nm laser (1.5 J, 10 ms), sustained heat stimulation by 1940-nm laser (50-55 °C temperature control mode or 1.5 W, 5 min continuous power supply), and the combination of transient/sustained heat stimulation by dual lasers (1.5 J, 10 ms, 980-nm pulse laser, and 1940-nm laser with 50-55 °C temperature control mode). Hemoglobin brushing and wind-cooling methods were tested to find better stimulation model. A classic tail-flick latency (TFL) experiment with 20 Wistar rats was used to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of transient and tonic pain stimulation with 15 J, 100 ms 980-nm single laser pulse, and 1.5 W constant 1940-nm laser power. Ideal stimulation parameters to generate transient pain were found to be a 26.6 °C peak temperature rise and 0.67 s pain duration. In our model of tonic pain, 5 min of tonic stimulation produced a temperature change of 53.7 ± 1.3 °C with 1.6 ± 0.2% variation. When the transient and tonic stimulation protocols were combined, no significant difference was observed depending on the order of stimuli. Obvious tail-flick movements were observed. The TFL value of transient pain was 3.0 ± 0.8 s, and it was 4.4 ± 1.8 s for tonic pain stimulation. This study shows that our novel design can provide effective stimulation of transient pain and stable tonic pain. Furthermore, it can also provide a reliable combination of transient and consistent stimulations for basic studies of pain perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser stimulator; Nociceptive stimulation; Temperature feedback control system; Tonic pain; Transient pain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528394     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2200-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  41 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of nociception.

Authors:  D Julius; A I Basbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Clinical usefulness of laser-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Jürgen Lorenz; Ulf Baumgärtner
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

Authors:  I Ronga; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Effect of low-level laser irradiation on proliferation of human dental mesenchymal stem cells; a systemic review.

Authors:  Ali Borzabadi-Farahani
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.252

Review 5.  Low level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in the management of side effects of chemoradiation therapy in head and neck cancer: part 1: mechanisms of action, dosimetric, and safety considerations.

Authors:  Judith A E M Zecha; Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Raj G Nair; Joel B Epstein; Stephen T Sonis; Sharon Elad; Michael R Hamblin; Andrei Barasch; Cesar A Migliorati; Dan M J Milstein; Marie-Thérèse Genot; Liset Lansaat; Ron van der Brink; Josep Arnabat-Dominguez; Lisette van der Molen; Irene Jacobi; Judi van Diessen; Jan de Lange; Ludi E Smeele; Mark M Schubert; René-Jean Bensadoun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Low-level laser therapy to treat fibromyalgia.

Authors:  J A Ruaro; A R Fréz; M B Ruaro; R A Nicolau
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Lasers and other thermal stimulators for activation of skin nociceptors in humans.

Authors:  L Arendt-Nielsen; A C N Chen
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.734

8.  individual variation in sleep quality and duration is related to cerebral mu opioid receptor binding potential during tonic laboratory pain in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Sara C Bounds; Hiroto Kuwabara; Robert R Edwards; James N Campbell; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Michael T Smith
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  Reported concepts for the treatment modalities and pain management of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Mieszko Wieckiewicz; Klaus Boening; Piotr Wiland; Yuh-Yuan Shiau; Anna Paradowska-Stolarz
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 10.  Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Gregory Glazov; Michael Yelland; Jon Emery
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low Back Pain Assessment Based on Alpha Oscillation Changes in Spontaneous Electroencephalogram (EEG).

Authors:  Li Feng; Hanlei Li; Hongyan Cui; Xiaobo Xie; Shengpu Xu; Yong Hu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.