Literature DB >> 33945127

Memorisation and implicit perceptual learning are enhanced for preferred musical intervals and chords.

Pietro Sarasso1, Pasqualina Perna1, Paolo Barbieri1, Marco Neppi-Modona1, Katiuscia Sacco1, Irene Ronga2.   

Abstract

Is it true that we learn better what we like? Current neuroaesthetic and neurocomputational models of aesthetic appreciation postulate the existence of a correlation between aesthetic appreciation and learning. However, even though aesthetic appreciation has been associated with attentional enhancements, systematic evidence demonstrating its influence on learning processes is still lacking. Here, in two experiments, we investigated the relationship between aesthetic preferences for consonance versus dissonance and the memorisation of musical intervals and chords. In Experiment 1, 60 participants were first asked to memorise and evaluate arpeggiated triad chords (memorisation phase), then, following a distraction task, chords' memorisation accuracy was measured (recognition phase). Memorisation resulted to be significantly enhanced for subjectively preferred as compared with non-preferred chords. To explore the possible neural mechanisms underlying these results, we performed an EEG study, directed to investigate implicit perceptual learning dynamics (Experiment 2). Through an auditory mismatch detection paradigm, electrophysiological responses to standard/deviant intervals were recorded, while participants were asked to evaluate the beauty of the intervals. We found a significant trial-by-trial correlation between subjective aesthetic judgements and single trial amplitude fluctuations of the ERP attention-related N1 component. Moreover, implicit perceptual learning, expressed by larger mismatch detection responses, was enhanced for more appreciated intervals. Altogether, our results showed the existence of a relationship between aesthetic appreciation and implicit learning dynamics as well as higher-order learning processes, such as memorisation. This finding might suggest possible future applications in different research domains such as teaching and rehabilitation of memory and attentional deficits.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Memory; Neuroaesthetics; Perceptual learning; Sound recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33945127      PMCID: PMC8500890          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01922-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  83 in total

1.  Simultaneous recording of event-related auditory oddball response using transcranial near infrared optical topography and surface EEG.

Authors:  Richard P Kennan; Silvina G Horovitz; Atsushi Maki; Yuichi Yamashita; Hideaki Koizumi; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Unconscious detection of implicit expectancies.

Authors:  Michael Rose; Hilde Haider; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt.

Authors:  Claudia Muth; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-06-03

4.  Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons--an ERP study.

Authors:  Mira Müller; Lea Höfel; Elvira Brattico; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 5.  Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Matthew Pelowski; Patrick S Markey; Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

Authors:  I Ronga; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Beauty in mind: Aesthetic appreciation correlates with perceptual facilitation and attentional amplification.

Authors:  P Sarasso; I Ronga; P Kobau; T Bosso; I Artusio; R Ricci; M Neppi-Modona
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Probabilistic models of expectation violation predict psychophysiological emotional responses to live concert music.

Authors:  Hauke Egermann; Marcus T Pearce; Geraint A Wiggins; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  Reduced left-lateralized pattern of event-related EEG oscillations in infants at familial risk for language and learning impairment.

Authors:  Chiara Cantiani; Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla; Valentina Riva; Caterina Piazza; Roberta Bettoni; Gabriella Musacchia; Massimo Molteni; Cecilia Marino; April A Benasich
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Beauty and the beholder: the role of visual sensitivity in visual preference.

Authors:  Branka Spehar; Solomon Wong; Sarah van de Klundert; Jessie Lui; Colin W G Clifford; Richard P Taylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Virtual Navigation Training Promotes the Remapping of Space in Allocentric Coordinates: Evidence From Behavioral and Neuroimaging Data.

Authors:  Katiuscia Sacco; Irene Ronga; Pasqualina Perna; Alessandro Cicerale; Elena Del Fante; Pietro Sarasso; Giuliano Carlo Geminiani
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Beauty and Uncertainty as Transformative Factors: A Free Energy Principle Account of Aesthetic Diagnosis and Intervention in Gestalt Psychotherapy.

Authors:  Pietro Sarasso; Gianni Francesetti; Jan Roubal; Michela Gecele; Irene Ronga; Marco Neppi-Modona; Katiuscia Sacco
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.