Literature DB >> 23136294

DNA microarray reveals that high proportions of human blastocysts from women of advanced maternal age are aneuploid and mosaic.

Jianqiao Liu1, Weihua Wang, Xiaofang Sun, Lian Liu, Hua Jin, Man Li, Craig Witz, Dan Williams, Jason Griffith, Josh Skorupski, Gus Haddad, Jimmy Gill.   

Abstract

Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and DNA microarray have become the new technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in humans. In this study, we comprehensively examined aneuploid formation in human blastocysts produced in vitro with microarray and investigated the clinical outcome after transfer of euploid embryos. Biopsied cells from either TE or inner cell mass (ICM) were processed for microarray to examine the errors in 23 pairs of chromosomes and the consistency between TE and ICM. It was found that 56.6% of blastocysts were aneuploid. Further analysis indicated that 62.3% of aneuploid blastocysts had single and 37.7% had multiple chromosomal abnormalities. Chromosome errors could occur in any chromosome, but errors in chromosome 21 accounted for the most (11.3%) among the 23 pairs of chromosomes. Transfer of array-screened blastocysts produced high pregnancy (70.2%) and implantation (63.5%) rates. Microarray of TE and ICM cells in the same blastocysts revealed that high proportions of aneuploid blastocysts (69.2%) were mosaic, including aneuploid TE and euploid ICM, inconsistent anomalies between ICM and TE, or euploid TE cells and aneuploid ICM in the same blastocyst. These results indicate that high proportions of human blastocysts produced in vitro from women of advanced maternal age are aneuploid and mosaic. Errors can occur in any of the 23 pairs of chromosomes in human blastocysts. Biopsy from TE in blastocysts does not exactly predict the chromosomal information in ICM if the embryos are aneuploid. Some mosaic blastocysts have euploid ICM, which may indicate important differentiate mechanism(s) of human preimplantation embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136294     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.103192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  36 in total

1.  Chromosome constitution of equal-sized three-cell embryos using next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Minyue Ma; Shihui Zhang; Chongzhao Lu; Shuling Wang; Yuanqing Yao; Hongmei Peng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Liying Yan; Sijia Lu; Nan Zhao; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Maternal age and initial β-hCG levels predict pregnancy outcome after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Satoshi Ueno; Kenji Ezoe; Takashi Abe; Akiko Yabuuchi; Kazuo Uchiyama; Takashi Okuno; Tamotsu Kobayashi; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Should preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) be implemented to routine IVF practice?

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Less-invasive chromosome screening of embryos and embryo assessment by genetic studies of DNA in embryo culture medium.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Hong Xia; Haixia Chen; Chenxi Yao; Lizhen Feng; Xueru Song; Xiaohong Bai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Ghassan Haddad; Maimin Deng; Cassie T Wang; Craig Witz; Daniel Williams; Jason Griffith; Josh Skorupski; Jimmy Gill; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Human embryo mosaicism: did we drop the ball on chromosomal testing?

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Megan E Bunnell; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Optimizing the Diagnostic Strategy to Identify Genetic Abnormalities in Miscarriage.

Authors:  Myungshin Kim; In Yang Park; Jong-Mi Lee; So Young Shin; Guk Won Kim; Woo Jeng Kim; Jeong Ha Wie; Subeen Hong; Dain Kang; Hayoung Choi; Jisook Yim; Yonggoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  Identification of chromosomal errors in human preimplantation embryos with oligonucleotide DNA microarray.

Authors:  Lifeng Liang; Cassie T Wang; Xiaofang Sun; Lian Liu; Man Li; Craig Witz; Daniel Williams; Jason Griffith; Josh Skorupski; Ghassan Haddad; Jimmy Gill; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.