Literature DB >> 1467721

Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.

T H Gould1, D L Crosby, M Harmer, S M Lloyd, J N Lunn, G A Rees, D E Roberts, J A Webster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of introducing an acute pain service to the general surgical wards of a large teaching hospital.
DESIGN: A study in seven stages: (1) an audit of current hospital practice succeeded by the sequential introduction to the general surgical wards of (2) pain assessment charts; (3) an algorithm to allow more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia; (4) increased use of local anaesthetic techniques of wound infiltration and nerve blocks; (5) an information sheet for patients about postoperative pain; (6) the introduction of patient controlled analgesia; (7) a repeat audit of hospital practice. Data were collected on each patient 24 hours after operation.
SETTING: University Hospital of Wales, which has both district general and tertiary referral functions. PATIENTS: 2035 patients over nine months from all surgical specialties (excluding cardiac) at the hospital. General surgical operations were studied in detail and separated into major, intermediate, and minor for data collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A change in the median visual analogue pain scores 24 hours after surgery for pain during relaxation, pain on movement, and pain on deep inspiration at each stage of the study.
RESULTS: There was a reduction in median visual analogue scores during the study. The median (95% confidence interval) scores for pain during relaxation decreased from 45 (34 to 53) in stage 1 to 16 (10 to 20) in stage 7 for major surgical procedures. Pain on movement decreased from 78 (66 to 80) to 46 (38 to 48), and pain on deep inspiration decreased from 64 (48 to 78) to 36 (31 to 38). The reductions in median scores for intermediate and minor operative procedures showed similar patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an acute pain service to the general surgical wards led to considerable improvement in the level of postoperative pain as assessed by visual analogue scores. Simple techniques of regular pain assessment and the more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia as a result of using an algorithm were particularly effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1467721      PMCID: PMC1883782          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of contemporaneous and retrospective assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  W H Liu; A R Aitkenhead
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Development of an anesthesiology-based postoperative pain management service.

Authors:  L B Ready; R Oden; H S Chadwick; C Benedetti; G A Rooke; R Caplan; L M Wild
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Anaesthetists, lawyers and the public.

Authors:  J N Lunn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  An acute pain service in an Australian teaching hospital: the first year.

Authors:  P E Macintyre; W B Runciman; R K Webb
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Pethidine revisited: plasma concentrations and effects after intramuscular injection.

Authors:  L E Mather; M J Lindop; G T Tucker; A E Pflug
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A randomised double-blind study of interpleural analgesia after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Lee; D Boon; P Bagshaw; P Kempthorne
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Self-administered nalbuphine, morphine and pethidine. Comparison, by intravenous route, following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Bahar; M Rosen; M D Vickers
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain.

Authors:  J E Baños; F Bosch; M Cañellas; A Bassols; F Ortega; J Bigorra
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-02

9.  The first year's experience of an acute pain service.

Authors:  R G Wheatley; T H Madej; I J Jackson; D Hunter
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Postoperative analgesia: a comparison of intravenous on-demand fentanyl with epidural bupivacaine.

Authors:  W D White; D J Pearce; J Norman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-07-21
  10 in total
  26 in total

Review 1.  Patient-controlled analgesia: an appropriate method of pain control in children.

Authors:  A J McDonald; M G Cooper
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  [Organization of pain therapy in surgery--comparison of acute pain service and alternative concepts].

Authors:  M Lempa; P Gerards; E Eypasch; H Troidl; E Neugebauer; L Köhler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [How organized acute pain therapy in Germany began].

Authors:  C Maier; H Wulf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  [Perioperative pain therapy for knee endoprosthetics].

Authors:  K J Wagner; E F Kochs; V Krautheim; L Gerdesmeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy.

Authors:  R N Upton; T J Semple; P E Macintyre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  [Organisation of acute pain therapy].

Authors:  H Vogelsang; H Laubenthal
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications: efficient and safe treatment following video-assisted pleurodesis for spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors:  Alon Ben-Nun; Nir Golan; Irena Faibishenko; David Simansky; Michalle Soudack
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Quality in (acute) pain therapy: plea for a paradigm shift].

Authors:  W Meissner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 9.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 10.  Choosing the right analgesic. A guide to selection.

Authors:  Timothy G Bushnell; Douglas M Justins
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.