Literature DB >> 23133341

Incorporating Phase-Dependent Polarizability in Non-Additive Electrostatic Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Aqueous Liquid-Vapor Interface.

Brad A Bauer1, G Lee Warren, Sandeep Patel.   

Abstract

We discuss a new classical water force field that explicitly accounts for differences in polarizability between liquid and vapor phases. The TIP4P-QDP (4-point transferable intermolecular potential with charge dependent-polarizability) force field is a modification of the original TIP4P-FQ fluctuating charge water force field of Rick et al.(1) that self-consistently adjusts its atomic hardness parameters via a scaling function dependent on the M-site charge. The electronegativity (χ) parameters are also scaled in order to reproduce condensed-phase dipole moments of comparable magnitude to TIP4P-FQ. TIP4P-QDP is parameterized to reproduce experimental gas-phase and select condensed-phase properties. The TIP4P-QDP water model possesses a gas phase polarizability of 1.40 Å(3) and gas-phase dipole moment of 1.85 Debye, in excellent agreement with experiment and high-level ab initio predictions. The liquid density of TIP4P-QDP is 0.9954(±0.0002) g/cm(3) at 298 K and 1 atmosphere, and the enthalpy of vaporization is 10.55(±0.12) kcal/mol. Other condensed-phase properties such as the isobaric heat capacity, isothermal compressibility, and diffusion constant are also calculated within reasonable accuracy of experiment and consistent with predictions of other current state-of-the-art water force fields. The average molecular dipole moment of TIP4P-QDP in the condensed phase is 2.641(±0.001) Debye, approximately 0.02 Debye higher than TIP4P-FQ and within the range of values currently surmised for the bulk liquid. The dielectric constant, ε = 85.8 ± 1.0, is 10% higher than experiment. This is reasoned to be due to the increase in the condensed phase dipole moment over TIP4P-FQ, which estimates ε remarkably well. Radial distribution functions for TIP4P-QDP and TIP4P-FQ show similar features, with TIP4P-QDP showing slightly reduced peak heights and subtle shifts towards larger distance interactions. Since the greatest effects of the phase-dependent polarizability are anticipated in regions with both liquid and vapor character, interfacial simulations of TIP4P-QDP were performed and compared to TIP4P-FQ, a static polarizability analog. Despite similar features in density profiles such as the position of the GDS and interfacial width, enhanced dipole moments are observed for the TIP4P-QDP interface and onset of the vapor phase. Water orientational profiles show an increased preference (over TIP4P-FQ) in the orientation of the permanent dipole vector of the molecule within the interface; an enhanced z-induced dipole moment directly results from this preference. Hydrogen bond formation is lower, on average, in the bulk for TIP4P-QDP than TIP4P-FQ. However, the average number of hydrogen bonds formed by TIP4P-QDP in the interface exceeds that of TIP4P-FQ, and observed hydrogen bond networks extend further into the gaseous region. The TIP4P-QDP interfacial potential, calculated to be -11.98(±0.08) kcal/mol, is less favorable than that for TIP4P-FQ by approximately 2% as a result of a diminished quadrupole contribution. Surface tension is calculated within a 1.3% reduction from the experimental value. Results reported demonstrate TIP4P-QDP as a model comparable to the popular TIP4P-FQ while accounting for a physical effect previously neglected by other water models. Further refinements to this model, as well as future applications are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23133341      PMCID: PMC3488353          DOI: 10.1021/ct800320f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  47 in total

1.  Comment on "Study on the liquid-vapor interface of water. I. Simulation results of thermodynamic properties and orientational structure".

Authors:  M A Wilson; A Pohorille; L R Pratt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  1989-05-01       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Ion solvation thermodynamics from simulation with a polarizable force field.

Authors:  Alan Grossfield; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Toward a Separate Reproduction of the Contributions to the Hartree-Fock and DFT Intermolecular Interaction Energies by Polarizable Molecular Mechanics with the SIBFA Potential.

Authors:  Jean-Philip Piquemal; Hilaire Chevreau; Nohad Gresh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Molecular dynamics simulations of liquid methanol and methanol-water mixtures with polarizable models.

Authors:  Haibo Yu; Daan P Geerke; Haiyan Liu; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Structure and dynamics of the aqueous liquid-vapor interface: a comprehensive particle-based simulation study.

Authors:  I-F Will Kuo; Christopher J Mundy; Becky L Eggimann; Matthew J McGrath; J Ilja Siepmann; Bin Chen; John Vieceli; Douglas J Tobias
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  An interpretation of the enhancement of the water dipole moment due to the presence of other water molecules.

Authors:  Daniel D Kemp; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Additive and Classical Drude Polarizable Force Fields for Linear and Cyclic Ethers.

Authors:  Igor Vorobyov; Victor M Anisimov; Shannon Greene; Richard M Venable; Adam Moser; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Surface potential of the water liquid-vapor interface.

Authors:  M A Wilson; A Pohorille; L R Pratt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Electrostatic properties of aqueous salt solution interfaces: a comparison of polarizable and nonpolarizable ion models.

Authors:  G Lee Warren; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  13 in total

1.  Role of electrostatics in modulating hydrophobic interactions and barriers to hydrophobic assembly.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Drude polarizable force field for aliphatic ketones and aldehydes, and their associated acyclic carbohydrates.

Authors:  Meagan C Small; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Fang-Yu Lin; Xibing He; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Properties of water along the liquid-vapor coexistence curve via molecular dynamics simulations using the polarizable TIP4P-QDP-LJ water model.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Interfacial structure, thermodynamics, and electrostatics of aqueous methanol solutions via molecular dynamics simulations using charge equilibration models.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Yang Zhong; Brad A Bauer; Joseph E Davis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Biomolecular force fields: where have we been, where are we now, where do we need to go and how do we get there?

Authors:  Pnina Dauber-Osguthorpe; A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Automation of AMOEBA polarizable force field parameterization for small molecules.

Authors:  Johnny C Wu; Gaurav Chattree; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 1.702

7.  Phase-transfer energetics of small-molecule alcohols across the water-hexane interface: molecular dynamics simulations using charge equilibration models.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Yang Zhong; David J Meninger; Joseph E Davis; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 8.  Charge equilibration force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of lipids, bilayers, and integral membrane protein systems.

Authors:  Timothy R Lucas; Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

9.  Molecular dynamics simulations of nonpolarizable inorganic salt solution interfaces: NaCl, NaBr, and NaI in transferable intermolecular potential 4-point with charge dependent polarizability (TIP4P-QDP) water.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Spherical monovalent ions at aqueous liquid-vapor interfaces: interfacial stability and induced interface fluctuations.

Authors:  Shuching Ou; Yuan Hu; Sandeep Patel; Hongbin Wan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.