| Literature DB >> 23130168 |
Parham Eshtehardi1, Michael C McDaniel, Jin Suo, Saurabh S Dhawan, Lucas H Timmins, José Nilo G Binongo, Lucas J Golub, Michel T Corban, Aloke V Finn, John N Oshinski, Arshed A Quyyumi, Don P Giddens, Habib Samady.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extremes of wall shear stress (WSS) have been associated with plaque progression and transformation, which has raised interest in the clinical assessment of WSS. We hypothesized that calculated coronary WSS is predicted only partially by luminal geometry and that WSS is related to plaque composition. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; computational fluid dynamics; coronary arteries; histology, virtual; ultrasonography, intravascular; wall shear stress
Year: 2012 PMID: 23130168 PMCID: PMC3487351 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1.An example of WSS profile of the left anterior descending coronary artery from a study patient, showing areas of variable WSS. Time‐averaged WSS values were circumferentially averaged for each IVUS segment to provide quantitative hemodynamic data to correlate with plaque data. The colors represent different values of WSS as depicted in the scale on the right side. The outer mesh represents the EEM, and the area between EEM and lumen (colored) is considered to be plaque. Each cross‐sectional line in the mesh represents 1 VH‐IVUS frame.
Figure 2.An example of WSS profile of another patient demonstrating heterogeneity of distribution of WSS, which would be difficult to ascertain from geometry alone. The colors represent different values of WSS as depicted in the scale on the right side. Black dots are superimposed VH‐IVUS–derived necrotic core and dense calcium data. A cross‐sectional view of study segment representing 1 VH‐IVUS segment with 0.5‐mm thickness is also shown.
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Study Population (N=27 Patients)
| Age, y | 50 (44–66) |
| Male, n (%) | 16 (60) |
| White race, n (%) | 18 (67) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 29.8 (26.2–36.2) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 16 (60) |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 128 (116–143) |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 73 (69–85) |
| Heart rate, bpm | 66 (56–80) |
| Current smoking, n (%) | 6 (22) |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 7 (26) |
| Hypercholesterolemia, n (%) | 7 (26) |
| Statin use, n (%) | 4 (15) |
| β‐Blocker use, n (%) | 11 (41) |
| Calcium channel blocker use, n (%) | 2 (7) |
| ACE inhibitor or ARB use, n (%) | 11 (41) |
| Family history of CAD, n (%) | 12 (44) |
| Previous myocardial infarction, n (%) | 2 (8) |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 181.5 (160.0–204.3) |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 114.0 (70.5–152.8) |
| FFR* | 0.93 (0.81–0.96) |
Data are number (%) or median (Q1–Q3).
ACE indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL.*Measured in 28 vessels as described in the Methods.
Grayscale IVUS Findings of Study Population Stratified for WSS Quartiles
| WSS 1st Q | WSS 2nd Q | WSS 3rd Q | WSS 4th Q | ||
| EEM area, mm2 | 16.3 (14.7–18.0) | 15.3 (13.8–16.9) | 14.8 (13.4–16.4) | 14.7 (13.3–16.2) | <0.0001 |
| Lumen area, mm2 | 10.7 (9.6–12.0) | 9.8 (8.8–11.0) | 8.9 (8.0–9.9) | 7.5 (6.7–8.4) | <0.0001 |
| Plaque area, mm2 | 5.1 (4.2–6.2) | 4.8 (4.0–5.8) | 5.2 (4.3–6.3) | 5.8 (4.8–7.0) | <0.0001 |
| Plaque burden, % | 31.1 (27.0–35.8) | 31.4 (27.3–36.1) | 34.8 (30.3–40.0) | 39.4 (34.3–45.3) | <0.0001 |
Q indicates quartile. Model‐based means for each category are reported as mean (95% CI).
Mixed‐effects models were used to account for repeated measurements.
Figure 3.Association between WSS and quartiles of plaque burden. The range of plaque burden in each quartile is shown in brackets. Error bars are 1 standard error.
Figure 4.A, Percentage of segments with low WSS (<10 dynes/cm2) within the lesions and proximal to and distal to lesions. B, Percentage of segments with high WSS (≥25 dynes/cm2) within the lesions and proximal to and distal to lesions. *P value: The GLIMMIX procedure in SAS did not converge when fitting the statistical model for Figure 4B. Convergence was achieved when lesion and distal were consolidated into 1 category.
Figure 5.Percentage of segments with low WSS (<10 dynes/cm2) within the bifurcations, and 0 to 5 mm, 5 to 10 mm, and 10 to 15 mm distal to bifurcations.