Literature DB >> 28148771

Oscillatory wall shear stress is a dominant flow characteristic affecting lesion progression patterns and plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease.

Lucas H Timmins1,2,3, David S Molony2,3, Parham Eshtehardi2, Michael C McDaniel2, John N Oshinski4,3, Don P Giddens3, Habib Samady2.   

Abstract

Although experimental studies suggest that low and oscillatory wall shear stress (WSS) promotes plaque transformation to a more vulnerable phenotype, this relationship has not been examined in human atherosclerosis progression. Thus, the aim of this investigation was to examine the association between oscillatory WSS, in combination with WSS magnitude, and coronary atherosclerosis progression. We hypothesized that regions of low and oscillatory WSS will demonstrate progression towards more vulnerable lesions, while regions exposed to low and non-oscillatory WSS will exhibit progression towards more stable lesions. Patients (n = 20) with non-flow-limiting coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent baseline and six-month follow-up angiography, Doppler velocity and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) acquisition. Computational fluid dynamics models were constructed to compute time-averaged WSS magnitude and oscillatory WSS. Changes in VH-IVUS-defined total plaque and constituent areas were quantified in focal regions (i.e. sectors; n = 14 235) and compared across haemodynamic categories. Compared with sectors exposed to low WSS magnitude, high WSS sectors demonstrated regression of total plaque area (p < 0.001) and fibrous tissue (p < 0.001), and similar progression of necrotic core. Sectors subjected to low and oscillatory WSS exhibited total plaque area regression, while low and non-oscillatory WSS sectors demonstrated total plaque progression (p < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with low and non-oscillatory WSS areas, sectors exposed to low and oscillatory WSS demonstrated regression of fibrous (p < 0.001) and fibrofatty (p < 0.001) tissue and similar progression of necrotic core (p = 0.82) and dense calcium (p = 0.40). Herein, we demonstrate that, in patients with non-obstructive CAD, sectors subjected to low and oscillatory WSS demonstrated regression of total plaque, fibrous and fibrofatty tissue, and progression of necrotic core and dense calcium, which suggest a transformation to a more vulnerable phenotype.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerosis; computational fluid dynamics; coronary artery disease; haemodynamics; intravascular ultrasound; wall shear stress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148771      PMCID: PMC5332583          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  43 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions.

Authors:  R Virmani; F D Kolodgie; A P Burke; A Farb; S M Schwartz
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography--methods and validation.

Authors:  A Wahle; P M Prause; S C DeJong; M Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.

Authors:  Anuja Nair; Barry D Kuban; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; D Geoffrey Vince
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability.

Authors:  Heather A Himburg; Deborah M Grzybowski; Andrew L Hazel; Jeffrey A LaMack; Xue-Mei Li; Morton H Friedman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: Steady flows.

Authors:  Y I Cho; K R Kensey
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Increased plasmin and serine proteinase activity during flow-induced intimal atrophy in baboon PTFE grafts.

Authors:  Richard D Kenagy; Jens W Fischer; Mark G Davies; Scott A Berceli; Suzanne M Hawkins; Thomas N Wight; Alexander W Clowes
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Framework to co-register longitudinal virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound data in the circumferential direction.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; Jonathan D Suever; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Habib Samady; Don P Giddens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Co-localization of Disturbed Flow Patterns and Occlusive Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Lesion Formation in Heart Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; Divya Gupta; Michel T Corban; David S Molony; John N Oshinski; Habib Samady; Don P Giddens
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.495

9.  Effect of endothelial shear stress on the progression of coronary artery disease, vascular remodeling, and in-stent restenosis in humans: in vivo 6-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Peter H Stone; Ahmet U Coskun; Scott Kinlay; Maureen E Clark; Milan Sonka; Andreas Wahle; Olusegun J Ilegbusi; Yerem Yeghiazarians; Jeffrey J Popma; John Orav; Richard E Kuntz; Charles L Feldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  16 in total

1.  Coronary computed tomography angiography-based endothelial wall shear stress in normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jussi Schultz; Inge J van den Hoogen; Jurrien H Kuneman; Michiel A de Graaf; Vasileios Kamperidis; Alexander Broersen; J Wouter Jukema; Antonis Sakellarios; Sotirios Nikopoulos; Konstantina Tsarapatsani; Katerina Naka; Lampros Michalis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis; Teemu Maaniitty; Antti Saraste; Jeroen J Bax; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Authors:  Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Segment-specific associations between local haemodynamic and imaging markers of early atherosclerosis at the carotid artery: an in vivo human study.

Authors:  Diego Gallo; Payam B Bijari; Umberto Morbiducci; Ye Qiao; Yuanyuan Joyce Xie; Maryam Etesami; Damiaan Habets; Edward G Lakatta; Bruce A Wasserman; David A Steinman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Shear stress: the dark energy of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Paul C Evans; Maria Fragiadaki; Paul D Morris; Jovana Serbanovic-Canic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 13.081

5.  Temporal and spatial changes in wall shear stress during atherosclerotic plaque progression in mice.

Authors:  R Xing; A M Moerman; Y Ridwan; M J Daemen; A F W van der Steen; F J H Gijsen; K van der Heiden
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Combined intracoronary assessment and treatment of a patient with coronary plaque rapid progression prior to acute myocardial infarction: A case report.

Authors:  Daoyuan Si; Beibei Du; Yanan Zhao; Xiangdong Li; Xingtong Wang; Kun Liu; Yuquan He; Ping Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Impact of combined plaque structural stress and wall shear stress on coronary plaque progression, regression, and changes in composition.

Authors:  Charis Costopoulos; Lucas H Timmins; Yuan Huang; Olivia Y Hung; David S Molony; Adam J Brown; Emily L Davis; Zhongzhao Teng; Jonathan H Gillard; Habib Samady; Martin R Bennett
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Characterizing Intracranial Hemodynamics in Sickle Cell Anemia: Impact of Patient-Specific Viscosity.

Authors:  Sara B Keller; Jacob M Bumpus; J Christopher Gatenby; Elizabeth Yang; Adetola A Kassim; Carlton Dampier; John C Gore; Amanda K W Buck
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.305

Review 9.  The Evolution of Data Fusion Methodologies Developed to Reconstruct Coronary Artery Geometry From Intravascular Imaging and Coronary Angiography Data: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Yakup Kilic; Hannah Safi; Retesh Bajaj; Patrick W Serruys; Pieter Kitslaar; Anantharaman Ramasamy; Vincenzo Tufaro; Yoshinobu Onuma; Anthony Mathur; Ryo Torii; Andreas Baumbach; Christos V Bourantas
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Multidirectional wall shear stress promotes advanced coronary plaque development: comparing five shear stress metrics.

Authors:  Ayla Hoogendoorn; Annette M Kok; Eline M J Hartman; Giuseppe de Nisco; Lorena Casadonte; Claudio Chiastra; Adriaan Coenen; Suze-Anne Korteland; Kim Van der Heiden; Frank J H Gijsen; Dirk J Duncker; Antonius F W van der Steen; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 10.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.