Literature DB >> 20117397

Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory.

Morton J Kern1, Habib Samady.   

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117397     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  62 in total

1.  A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Mark Svendsen; Jenny Susana Choy; Z-D Zhang; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Invasive evaluation of patients after reperfused STEMI: one-stop-shop for anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Habib Samady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Storage of Fractional Flow Reserve Hemodynamic Waveforms Using Semantic Extension of the DICOM Standard.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kakouros
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  How to differentiate the etiology of LV dysfunction as to whether it is "ischemic cardiomyopathy" or "dilated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy"? Invasive coronary and myocardial assessment is the approach of first choice.

Authors:  Sung Gyun Ahn; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sercan Okutucu; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Marc D Feldman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  SPECT perfusion imaging and myocardial bridges: bridging the gap of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  Erin M Galbraith; Parham Eshtehardi; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Michel T Corban; Olivia Y Hung; Parham Eshtehardi; Emad Rasoul-Arzrumly; Michael McDaniel; Girum Mekonnen; Lucas H Timmins; Jerre Lutz; Robert A Guyton; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Fractional flow reserve guided revascularization in daily practice: clinical judgment does not always meet science.

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; Ronen Jaffe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

Review 10.  Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.