Literature DB >> 23129250

Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing.

Davood G Gozli1, Stephanie C Goodhew, Joshua B Moskowitz, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

The ideomotor theory of action posits that the cognitive representation of an action includes the learned perceptual effects of the action. Support for this theory has come from studies demonstrating how perceptual features that match the outcome of a response can facilitate selection of that response. We investigated another, complementary implication of ideomotor theory: would a bias toward selecting a response result in a perceptual bias toward the known effect of the response? In other words, would an action tendency direct attention to the anticipated perceptual features? Through an initial acquisition phase, participants learned that two possible responses (left/right keypress) consistently produced two distinct colors. Next, in a test phase, we manipulated response bias at the beginning of each trial, using an uninformative spatial prime presented at the left or right periphery. We then examined the extent to which color transients that either matched or mismatched the induced response bias can orient participants' visual attention. Results revealed a perceptual bias toward the color effect of the primed response, manifested in a stronger visual orienting toward this color. Thus, biasing response selection can bias perception. These findings extend the scope of the ideomotor theory to visual perceptual processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129250     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0461-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  51 in total

1.  Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments.

Authors:  A Schubö; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001

2.  Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  P Wühr; J Müsseler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Peter Wühr; Claudia Danielmeier; Stefan Zysset
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

Review 6.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception.

Authors:  Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single-feature discrimination within the same object?

Authors:  L R Fournier; C W Eriksen; C Bowd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-11

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  On interference effects in concurrent perception and action.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Marc Grosjean; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Hira Aslam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking.

Authors:  Greg Huffman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.