Literature DB >> 11642707

Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

P Wühr1, J Müsseler.   

Abstract

This article examines the time course of a deficit in identifying a stimulus sharing a compatible feature with a response that is executed in parallel ("blindness to response-compatible stimuli," J. Müsseler & B. Hommel, 1997a). In 5 experiments, participants performed a timed response, and the presentation point of time of a to-be-identified stimulus was varied in respect to response execution. A blindness effect was observed when the stimulus was presented between response cue offset and response execution. In contrast, the identification of a stimulus presented before the response cue or after response execution was not affected by stimulus-response compatibility--a finding that rules out a retention-based explanation. These results support an explanation that states that the perceptual processing of a stimulus feature is impaired as long as the shared perception-action feature code is integrated into the representation of a to-be-executed response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11642707     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.5.1260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-08

2.  Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency.

Authors:  Chris Oriet; Biljana Stevanovski; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-20

3.  Instruction-induced feature binding.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-10

4.  Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-12

5.  An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.

Authors:  Paul S Mattson; Lisa R Fournier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

6.  Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response.

Authors:  Lisa Renee Fournier; Matthew D Wiediger; Ryan McMeans; Paul S Mattson; Joy Kirkwood; Theibot Herzog
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

7.  The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking.

Authors:  Greg Huffman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

8.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

9.  Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Stephanie C Goodhew; Joshua B Moskowitz; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-06

10.  An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation.

Authors:  Desmond Mulligan; Keith R Lohse; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.