Literature DB >> 23127071

Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images.

Jia Wang1, Jodie A Christner, Xinhui Duan, Shuai Leng, Lifeng Yu, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate attenuation using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph (SPR) images in a series of thorax and abdomen phantoms.
METHODS: Attenuation was quantified in terms of a water cylinder with cross sectional area of A(w) from both the CT and SPR images of abdomen and thorax phantoms, where A(w) is the area of a water cylinder that would absorb the same dose as the specified phantom. SPR and axial CT images were acquired using a dual-source CT scanner operated at 120 kV in single-source mode. To use the SPR image for estimating A(w), the pixel values of a SPR image were calibrated to physical water attenuation using a series of water phantoms. A(w) and the corresponding diameter D(w) were calculated using the derived attenuation-based methods (from either CT or SPR image). A(w) was also calculated using only geometrical dimensions of the phantoms (anterior-posterior and lateral dimensions or cross sectional area).
RESULTS: For abdomen phantoms, the geometry-based and attenuation-based methods gave similar results for D(w). Using only geometric parameters, an overestimation of D(w) ranging from 4.3% to 21.5% was found for thorax phantoms. Results for D(w) using the CT image and SPR based methods agreed with each other within 4% on average in both thorax and abdomen phantoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Either the cross sectional CT or SPR images can be used to estimate patient attenuation in CT. Both are more accurate than use of only geometrical information for the task of quantifying patient attenuation. The SPR based method requires calibration of SPR pixel values to physical water attenuation and this calibration would be best performed by the scanner manufacturer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127071     DOI: 10.1118/1.4757586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?

Authors:  Boaz Karmazyn; Huisi Ai; Paul Klahr; Fangqian Ouyang; S Gregory Jennings
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06

2.  A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Authors:  Roshni A Parikh; Michael A Wien; Ronald D Novak; David W Jordan; Paul Klahr; Stephanie Soriano; Leslie Ciancibello; Sheila C Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  Estimation of signal and noise for a whole-body research photon-counting CT system.

Authors:  Zhoubo Li; Shuai Leng; Zhicong Yu; Steffen Kappler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-22

4.  Size-specific dose estimates in chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT examinations of pediatric patients.

Authors:  İsmail Özsoykal; Ayşegül Yurt; Kadir Akgüngör
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Automated pediatric abdominal effective diameter measurements versus age-predicted body size for normalization of CT dose.

Authors:  Phillip M Cheng; Linda A Vachon; Vinay A Duddalwar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Size-specific Dose Estimates for Chest, Abdominal, and Pelvic CT: Effect of Intrapatient Variability in Water-equivalent Diameter.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Maria Shiung; Xinhui Duan; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Lifeng Yu; Zhoubo Li; Armando Manduca; Daniel J Blezek; David M Hough; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Gregory C Brickner; Joseph C Cernigliaro; Amy K Hara; Jeff L Fidler; David S Lake; Maria Shiung; David Lewis; Shuai Leng; Kurt E Augustine; Rickey E Carter; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.

Authors:  Sarah E McKenney; J Anthony Seibert; Ramit Lamba; John M Boone
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220.

Authors:  Cynthia McCollough; Donovan M Bakalyar; Maryam Bostani; Samuel Brady; Kristen Boedeker; John M Boone; H Heather Chen-Mayer; Olav I Christianson; Shuai Leng; Baojun Li; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Roy A Nilsen; Mark P Supanich; Jia Wang
Journal:  AAPM Rep       Date:  2014-09

10.  Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images?

Authors:  Sarvenaz Pourjabbar; Sarabjeet Singh; Atul Padole; Akshay Saini; Michael A Blake; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.