Literature DB >> 23125785

Tetra-methyl-ammonium hydrogen terephthalate.

Leila Dolatyari1, Samad Shoghpour Bayraq, Sara Sharifi, Ali Ramazani, Ali Morsali, Hadi Amiri Rudbari.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title salt, C(4)H(12)N(+)·C(8)H(5)O(4) (-), contains one half of a tetra-methyl-ammonium cation and one half of a hydrogen terephthalate monoanion. The N atom of the ammonium cation lies on a twofold rotation axis and the centre of mass of the terephthalate anion is on a centre of inversion. In the crystal, the centrosymmetric terephthalate ions are linked by a very short symmetric O-H⋯O hydrogen bond [O⋯O = 2.4610 (19) Å] into a one-dimensional polymeric chain along [1-12]. The tetra-methyl-ammonium cations and terephthalate anions are then connected through a pair of bifurcated acceptor C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating a three-dimensional supra-molecular network. The carboxyl-ate groups at both ends of the terephthalate anion are charge-shared with an equal probability of 0.5.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125785      PMCID: PMC3470372          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812039487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a review of very short O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, see: Speakman (1972 ▶). For recent reports of acidic salts of dicarb­oxy­lic acids with short intra- and inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, see: Starosta & Leciejewicz (2010 ▶); Hemamalini & Fun (2010 ▶); Sun et al. (2002 ▶); Sharma et al. (2006 ▶); Wang et al. (2004 ▶); Taka et al. (1998 ▶). For examples of diphospho­nates with strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, see: Tsaryk et al. (2011 ▶); Courtney et al. (2006 ▶); Cheng & Lin (2006 ▶). For background to symmetric and asymmetric O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, see: Misaki et al. (1986 ▶); Catti & Ferraris (1976 ▶). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen bonds, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶); Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For the synthesis of the 5,5′-(o-phenyl­ene)di-1H-tetra­zole ligand, see: Demko & Sharpless (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H12NC8H5O4 M = 239.27 Monoclinic, a = 16.0585 (4) Å b = 9.1527 (2) Å c = 11.5866 (3) Å β = 132.915 (2)° V = 1247.21 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.42 × 0.37 × 0.32 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.708, T max = 0.746 20680 measured reflections 1360 independent reflections 1269 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.054 wR(F 2) = 0.147 S = 1.07 1360 reflections 80 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.57 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XPW (Siemens, 1996 ▶) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812039487/bg2478sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812039487/bg2478Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812039487/bg2478Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H12N+·C8H5O4F(000) = 512
Mr = 239.27Dx = 1.274 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 9931 reflections
a = 16.0585 (4) Åθ = 2.8–30.3°
b = 9.1527 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 11.5866 (3) ÅT = 298 K
β = 132.915 (2)°Irregular, colourless
V = 1247.21 (7) Å30.42 × 0.37 × 0.32 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1360 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1269 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −20→20
Tmin = 0.708, Tmax = 0.746k = −11→11
20680 measured reflectionsl = −14→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.147H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0714P)2 + 1.1167P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1360 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
80 parametersΔρmax = 0.57 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.43 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.32784 (9)0.78319 (13)0.13940 (12)0.0451 (4)
C50.51647 (12)0.89007 (16)0.43479 (16)0.0341 (4)
H50.52780.81650.39140.041*
C40.40806 (11)0.94633 (15)0.34990 (15)0.0312 (3)
C60.30731 (12)0.89045 (17)0.18691 (16)0.0363 (4)
O10.21412 (12)0.94615 (19)0.11216 (16)0.0789 (6)
N0.50000.3608 (2)0.25000.0416 (5)
C90.4511 (2)0.4550 (3)0.2947 (3)0.0794 (8)
H9A0.50970.51550.38230.119*
H9B0.41880.39510.32390.119*
H9C0.39280.51570.20700.119*
C30.39205 (12)1.05665 (16)0.41571 (16)0.0353 (4)
H30.31981.09500.35940.042*
C80.58943 (19)0.2666 (3)0.3849 (3)0.0695 (6)
H8A0.64730.32660.47370.104*
H8B0.62240.20710.35650.104*
H8C0.55650.20490.41200.104*
H20.25000.75000.00000.098 (13)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0364 (6)0.0526 (7)0.0300 (6)−0.0050 (5)0.0162 (5)−0.0175 (5)
C50.0348 (7)0.0345 (7)0.0276 (7)−0.0003 (5)0.0191 (6)−0.0076 (5)
C40.0315 (7)0.0324 (7)0.0218 (6)−0.0030 (5)0.0150 (6)−0.0043 (5)
C60.0319 (7)0.0405 (8)0.0235 (6)−0.0026 (6)0.0138 (6)−0.0054 (5)
O10.0420 (7)0.0938 (12)0.0411 (7)0.0188 (7)0.0048 (6)−0.0263 (7)
N0.0410 (10)0.0367 (9)0.0405 (10)0.0000.0252 (9)0.000
C90.0718 (15)0.0875 (17)0.0706 (14)0.0197 (12)0.0452 (13)−0.0130 (12)
C30.0292 (7)0.0373 (8)0.0278 (7)0.0024 (5)0.0149 (6)−0.0043 (5)
C80.0627 (13)0.0587 (12)0.0605 (13)0.0133 (10)0.0315 (11)0.0174 (10)
O2—C61.2739 (19)N—C81.481 (2)
C5—C41.390 (2)C9—H9A0.9600
C5—C3i1.3896 (19)C9—H9B0.9600
C5—H50.9300C9—H9C0.9600
C4—C31.391 (2)C3—C5i1.3896 (19)
C4—C61.5115 (18)C3—H30.9300
C6—O11.218 (2)C8—H8A0.9600
N—C9ii1.478 (2)C8—H8B0.9600
N—C91.478 (2)C8—H8C0.9600
N—C8ii1.481 (2)
C4—C5—C3i120.25 (13)N—C9—H9A109.5
C4—C5—H5119.9N—C9—H9B109.5
C3i—C5—H5119.9H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—C3119.41 (12)N—C9—H9C109.5
C5—C4—C6121.22 (12)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C3—C4—C6119.37 (13)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
O1—C6—O2124.70 (13)C5i—C3—C4120.33 (13)
O1—C6—C4119.89 (14)C5i—C3—H3119.8
O2—C6—C4115.39 (13)C4—C3—H3119.8
C9ii—N—C9108.6 (3)N—C8—H8A109.5
C9ii—N—C8ii109.57 (15)N—C8—H8B109.5
C9—N—C8ii110.17 (15)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C9ii—N—C8110.17 (15)N—C8—H8C109.5
C9—N—C8109.57 (15)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C8ii—N—C8108.7 (2)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C3i—C5—C4—C30.2 (3)C5—C4—C6—O24.7 (2)
C3i—C5—C4—C6179.82 (13)C3—C4—C6—O2−175.69 (14)
C5—C4—C6—O1−176.70 (17)C5—C4—C3—C5i−0.2 (3)
C3—C4—C6—O12.9 (2)C6—C4—C3—C5i−179.83 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O2iii1.231.232.4610 (19)180 (1)
C8—H8A···O1iv0.962.393.267 (3)152
C9—H9A···O1iv0.962.473.321 (3)148
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O2i 1.231.232.4610 (19)180 (1)
C8—H8A⋯O1ii 0.962.393.267 (3)152
C9—H9A⋯O1ii 0.962.473.321 (3)148

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  9 in total

1.  A lithium ethylenediphosphonate containing lithium chains and symmetric hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Ching Yuan Cheng; Kuan Jiuh Lin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

4.  Preparation of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles from nitriles in water.

Authors:  Z P Demko; K B Sharpless
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Symmetric hydrogen bonding in dimethylammonium hydrogen diphenyldiphosphonate.

Authors:  Brandy H Courtney; Booker W O Juma; Steven F Watkins; Frank R Fronczek; George G Stanley
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  X-ray studies of crystalline complexes involving amino acids and peptides. XLIII. Adipic acid complexes of L- and DL-lysine.

Authors:  Alok Sharma; S Thamotharan; Siddhartha Roy; M Vijayan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  catena-Poly[[(3,5-dicarb-oxy-pyrazine-2,6-dicarboxyl-ato-κO,N,O)lithium(I)]-μ-aqua-[triaqua-lithium(I)]-μ-aqua].

Authors:  Wojciech Starosta; Janusz Leciejewicz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-11-13

8.  A second triclinic polymorph of (1-ammonio-1-phosphono-eth-yl)phospho-nate.

Authors:  Natalia V Tsaryk; Anatolij V Dudko; Alexandra N Kozachkova; Vasily I Pekhnyo
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-06-18

9.  2-Amino-5-methyl-pyridinium 2-carb-oxy-benzoate.

Authors:  Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.