Literature DB >> 23117268

The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of patients with debility discharged from inpatient rehabilitation programs in 2000-2010.

Rebecca V Galloway1, Carl V Granger, Amol M Karmarkar, James E Graham, Anne Deutsch, Paulette Niewczyk, Margaret A DiVita, Kenneth J Ottenbacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Benchmark data are provided for a national sample of patients who received inpatient rehabilitation for debility.
DESIGN: Patients with debility from 830 inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from 2000 to 2010 were examined. Demographic information (age, marital status, sex, race/ethnicity, prehospital living setting, and discharge setting), hospital information (length of stay, program interruptions, payer, and codes for admitting diagnosis), and functional status (Functional Independence Measure [FIM] instrument ratings at admission and discharge, FIM change, and FIM efficiency) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Data from 2000 to 2010 (N = 260,373) revealed a decrease in mean (SD) FIM total admission ratings from 73.9 (16.2) to 62.5 (15.8). The FIM total discharge ratings decreased from 95.0 (19.7) to 88.2 (19.8). Mean (SD) length of stay decreased from 14.3 (9.1) to 12.1 (6.2) days. The FIM efficiency (change/day) increased from 1.9 (1.7) to 2.4 (1.9). Discharge to community decreased from 80% to 75%. Acute care discharges accounted for 12% of the cases. Policy changes affecting classification, reimbursement, and/or documentation processes may have influenced the results.
CONCLUSIONS: National data indicate that the number of debility cases is increasing with diverse composition of etiologic diagnoses. A high proportion of these patients is discharged to acute care compared with other impairment groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23117268      PMCID: PMC3652310          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827441bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  23 in total

1.  The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories.

Authors:  M G Stineman; J A Shea; A Jette; C J Tassoni; K J Ottenbacher; R Fiedler; C V Granger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for FY 2006. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2005-08-15

3.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic brain injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Samuel J Markello; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Timothy A Reistetter; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with lower limb joint replacement discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Samuel J Markello; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Timothy A Reistetter; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Anne Deutsch; Carol Russell; Terrie Black; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with stroke discharged from comprehensive medical programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Samuel J Markello; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Relation of disability costs to function: spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B B Hamilton; A Deutsch; C Russell; R C Fiedler; C V Granger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with debility.

Authors:  Patrick Kortebein; Melinda M Bopp; Carl V Granger; Dennis H Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  A comparative evaluation of inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with debility, hip fracture, and myopathy.

Authors:  Patrick Kortebein; Carl V Granger; Dennis H Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Apparent changes in inpatient rehabilitation facility outcomes due to a change in the definition of program interruption.

Authors:  Anne Deutsch; Carl V Granger; Carol Russell; Allen W Heinemann; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hospital Readmission Following Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Debility.

Authors:  Rebecca V Galloway; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Alai Tan; Mukaila Raji; Carl V Granger; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12-04

Review 2.  A Guide to Inpatient Cancer Rehabilitation: Focusing on Patient Selection and Evidence-Based Outcomes.

Authors:  Jack B Fu; Vishwa S Raj; Ying Guo
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Long-term functional outcome in patients with acquired infections after acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marcel A Kopp; Ralf Watzlawick; Peter Martus; Vieri Failli; Felix W Finkenstaedt; Yuying Chen; Michael J DeVivo; Ulrich Dirnagl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  How does nutritional state change during a subacute admission? Findings and implications for practice.

Authors:  J Collins; J Porter; H Truby; C E Huggins
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Thirty-day hospital readmission following discharge from postacute rehabilitation in fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Amol Karmarkar; James E Graham; Yong-Fang Kuo; Anne Deutsch; Timothy A Reistetter; Soham Al Snih; Carl V Granger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of follow-up information on patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010.

Authors:  James E Graham; Carl V Granger; Amol M Karmarkar; Anne Deutsch; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A Divita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Inpatient Rehabilitation After COVID-19 Hospitalization in a Patient With Lung Transplant: A Case Study.

Authors:  Christian Nicolosi; Kristina Barber; Christina Draganich; William Niehaus
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Predictors of improved functional outcome in elderly inpatients after rehabilitation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Koji Naruishi; Akiko Kunita; Katsuyuki Kubo; Toshihiko Nagata; Shogo Takashiba; Seiji Adachi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Which factors influence functional patients improvements during rehabilitation?

Authors:  Gabriele Messina; Lorena Rasimelli; Chiara Bonavita; Emma Ceriale; Cecilia Quercioli; Nicola Nante
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-02-20

10.  Demonstrating the vital role of physiatry throughout the health care continuum: Lessons learned from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jonathan H Whiteson; Miguel Xavier Escalón; Susan Maltser; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.