Literature DB >> 20299850

The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic brain injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007.

Carl V Granger1, Samuel J Markello, James E Graham, Anne Deutsch, Timothy A Reistetter, Kenneth J Ottenbacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide benchmarking information for a large national sample of patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN: Secondary data analysis from 893 medical rehabilitation facilities located in the United States that contributed information to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from January 2000 through December 2007. Variables analyzed included demographic information (age, sex, marital status, race or ethnicity, prehospital living setting, and discharge setting), hospitalization information (length of stay, program interruptions, payer, onset date, rehabilitation impairment group, Internation Classification of Diseases-9th revision codes for admitting diagnosis, and co-morbidities), and functional status information (FIM instrument [FIM] ratings at admission and discharge, FIM efficiency, FIM gain).
RESULTS: Descriptive statistics from 101,188 patients showed length of stay decreasing from a mean of 22.7 (+/-20.5) days to 16.6 (+/-14.8) days during the 8-yr study period. FIM total admission and discharge ratings also decreased. Mean admission ratings decreased from 58.6 (+/-24.7) to 54.8 (+/-21.2). Mean discharge ratings decreased from 92.4 (+/-24.2) to 85.0 (+/-24.0). Accordingly, mean functional independence measure change decreased from 33.8 (+/-20.5) to 30.2 (+/-18.4). The percentage of patients discharged to the community settings ranged from 81.3% in 2000 to 74.1% in 2007. All results are likely influenced by various policy changes affecting classification or documentation processes or both.
CONCLUSIONS: National rehabilitation data from persons with traumatic brain injury in 2000-2007 indicate that patients are spending less time in an inpatient care setting than in the previous years and are experiencing improvements in functional independence during their stay. In addition, a majority of patients are discharged to community settings after inpatient rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20299850      PMCID: PMC2918420          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181d3eb20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  17 in total

1.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1998.

Authors:  R C Fiedler; C V Granger; L A Post
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  UDS report. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994.

Authors:  R C Fiedler; C V Granger; K J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients.

Authors:  T A Dodds; D P Martin; W C Stolov; R A Deyo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1993.

Authors:  C V Granger; K J Ottenbacher; R C Fiedler
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure.

Authors:  M E Segal; M Gillard; R Schall
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Apparent changes in inpatient rehabilitation facility outcomes due to a change in the definition of program interruption.

Authors:  Anne Deutsch; Carl V Granger; Carol Russell; Allen W Heinemann; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Measuring function for Medicare inpatient rehabilitation payment.

Authors:  Grace M Carter; Daniel A Relles; Gregory K Ridgeway; Carolyn M Rimes
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  24 in total

1.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A Divita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Program Interruptions and Short-Stay Transfers Represent Potential Targets for Inpatient Rehabilitation Care-Improvement Efforts.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; James E Graham; Shilpa Krishnan; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Web-based training in family advocacy.

Authors:  Karen A McLaughlin; Ann Glang; Sherry Vondy Beaver; Jeff M Gau; Stacie Keen
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.710

4.  Functional outcomes by age for inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Hunter; Julie Baltisberger
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2012-03-22

5.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of patients with hip fracture discharged from comprehensive medical programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Timothy A Reistetter; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Samuel J Markello; Paulette Niewczyk; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Characterization of Cancer Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Mix; Carl V Granger; Michael J LaMonte; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A DiVita; Richard Goldstein; Jerome W Yates; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with lower limb joint replacement discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Samuel J Markello; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Timothy A Reistetter; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Physical disability after injury-related inpatient rehabilitation in children.

Authors:  Mark R Zonfrillo; Dennis R Durbin; Flaura K Winston; Huaqing Zhao; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Readmission to an Acute Care Hospital During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Flora M Hammond; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Cynthia L Beaulieu; Ryan S Barrett; David K Ryser; Teri Sommerfeld
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Residual cognitive disability after completion of inpatient rehabilitation among injured children.

Authors:  Mark R Zonfrillo; Dennis R Durbin; Flaura K Winston; Xuemei Zhang; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.