Literature DB >> 20855979

The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with lower limb joint replacement discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007.

Carl V Granger1, Samuel J Markello, James E Graham, Anne Deutsch, Timothy A Reistetter, Kenneth J Ottenbacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide benchmarking information from a large national sample of patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after lower limb joint replacement.
DESIGN: Secondary data analysis from 893 medical rehabilitation facilities located in the United States that contributed information to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from January 2000 through December 2007. Variables analyzed included demographic information (age, sex, marital status, race/ethnicity, prehospital living setting, discharge setting), hospitalization information (length of stay, program interruptions, payer, onset date, rehabilitation impairment group, International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes for admitting diagnosis, comorbidities), and functional status information (FIM instrument ["FIM"] ratings at admission and discharge, FIM efficiency, FIM gain).
RESULTS: Descriptive statistics from 705,345 patients showed an overall mean length of stay of 8.9 (±4.7) days. FIM total admission and discharge ratings declined during the 8-yr study period. Mean admission ratings decreased from 83.5 (±11.3) to 73.2 (±12.9). Mean discharge ratings decreased from 108.4 (±11.0) to 101.7 (±12.9). Conversely, mean FIM change increased from 24.9 (±9.2) to 28.6 (±12.2). The percent of persons discharged to the community decreased from 94.5% to 91.9%. All results are likely to be influenced by various policy changes affecting classification or documentation processes or both.
CONCLUSIONS: National rehabilitation data from persons with lower limb joint replacement in 2000-2007 indicate that inpatient rehabilitation lengths of stay have remained relatively stable and that patients are experiencing improvements in functional independence during their stay. In addition, more than 9 of 10 patients are discharged to community settings after inpatient rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20855979      PMCID: PMC3132401          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f1c83a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  21 in total

1.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1998.

Authors:  R C Fiedler; C V Granger; L A Post
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999.

Authors:  Anne Deutsch; Roger C Fiedler; Carl V Granger; Carol F Russell
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  UDS report. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994.

Authors:  R C Fiedler; C V Granger; K J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients.

Authors:  T A Dodds; D P Martin; W C Stolov; R A Deyo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1993.

Authors:  C V Granger; K J Ottenbacher; R C Fiedler
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure.

Authors:  M E Segal; M Gillard; R Schall
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Measuring function for Medicare inpatient rehabilitation payment.

Authors:  Grace M Carter; Daniel A Relles; Gregory K Ridgeway; Carolyn M Rimes
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  13 in total

1.  The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A Divita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Can Older Adults Accurately Report Their Use of Physical Rehabilitation Services?

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Alan Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Rehospitalization Over 10 Years Among Survivors of TBI: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

Authors:  Kristen Dams-OʼConnor; Dave Mellick; Laura E Dreer; Flora M Hammond; Jeanne Hoffman; Alexandra Landau; Ross Zafonte; Christopher Pretz
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

4.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of patients with hip fracture discharged from comprehensive medical programs in 2000-2007.

Authors:  Carl V Granger; Timothy A Reistetter; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Samuel J Markello; Paulette Niewczyk; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Characterization of Cancer Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Mix; Carl V Granger; Michael J LaMonte; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A DiVita; Richard Goldstein; Jerome W Yates; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Trajectories in functional recovery for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for unilateral hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  Saad M Bindawas; James E Graham; Amol M Karmarkar; Nai-Wei Chen; Carl V Granger; Paulette Niewczyk; Margret A DiVita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of patients with debility discharged from inpatient rehabilitation programs in 2000-2010.

Authors:  Rebecca V Galloway; Carl V Granger; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A DiVita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of follow-up information on patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010.

Authors:  James E Graham; Carl V Granger; Amol M Karmarkar; Anne Deutsch; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A Divita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Scheduled analgesic regimen improves rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Raymond Ping-Hong Chin; Chin-Hung Ho; Lydia Po-Chee Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Demonstrating the vital role of physiatry throughout the health care continuum: Lessons learned from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jonathan H Whiteson; Miguel Xavier Escalón; Susan Maltser; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.