| Literature DB >> 23114282 |
Hans Christian Rischke1, Arnd O Schäfer, Ursula Nestle, Natalja Volegova-Neher, Karl Henne, Matthias R Benz, Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann, Mathias Langer, Anca L Grosu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) without endorectal coil (EC) in the detection of local recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy (RP).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23114282 PMCID: PMC3560084 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Patient characteristics (n=33)
| Age (years) at PSA recurrence | |
| Median (range) | 69 (55 – 80) |
| T-stage at surgery | |
| pT4 | 3 (9) |
| pT3a/b | 11 (33) |
| pT2a-c | 19 (58) |
| Gleason-Score at surgery | |
| 6 | 1 (3) |
| 7 | 24 (73) |
| 8 | 6 (18) |
| 9 | 2 (6) |
| Surgical margins | |
| Positive | 11 (33) |
| Negative | 15 (46) |
| Unknown | 7 (21) |
| PSA level prior to surgery (ng/mL) | |
| Median | 9.8 |
| Mean±SD | 11.4±6.0 |
| Range | 2.9-25 |
| PSA level at recurrence (ng/mL) | |
| Median | 0.34 |
| Mean±SD | 0.57±0.58 |
| Range | 0.08-2.38 |
| PSA level at follow-up-MRI (ng/mL) | |
| Median | 0.00 |
| Mean±SD | 0.02±0.03 |
| Range | 0.00-0.07 |
Characteristics of lesions classified as true positive
| Number of suspicious lesions per patient | |
| unifocal | 20 (91) |
| bifocal | 2 (9) |
| Location of suspicious lesions* | |
| perianastomotic | 19 |
| retrovesical | 4 |
| other (peribulbic) | 1 |
| Shape of suspicious lesions | |
| round | 18 |
| planelike, elliptic | 4 |
| irregular | 2 |
| Diameter of suspicious lesions (mm) | |
| Median | 10 |
| Mean | 11±/4.4 |
| Range | 5-20 |
| Volume of suspicious lesions (mL) | |
| Median | 0.2 |
| Mean | 0.4±0.4 |
| Range | 0.1-1.5 |
*Two patients had bifocal lesions, one of them in two different locations therefore the numbers add up to 24.
Figure 1Example of a patient classified as true positive. A contrast enhancing lesion was detected on pre-RT DCE-MRI (a) (arrowhead), with completely morphologic response on the post-RT DCE-MRI (b).
Figure 2(a) Correlation between tumor volume and PSA (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.83; p<0.0001). (b) Correlation between tumor size and PSA (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.47; p=0.03).
Figure 3Scatter plot of pre-RT PSA levels in patients classified as true positive and false negative.
Figure 4Contrast enhancement at the anterior aspect of the proximal urethra immediately below the vesicourethral anastomosis on pre-RT DCE-MRI which was not associated to the patient’s recurrent prostate cancer (a) (arrowhead). Post-RT DCE-MRI demonstrating no obvious change of this structure following RT (b).