OBJECTIVES: To determine how urologists evaluate and treat men who develop recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to 4467 American Urological Association members comprising 3205 U.S. and 1262 non-U.S. urologists randomly selected from a total membership of approximately 12,000. One thousand four hundred sixteen were returned and 1050 (760 U.S. and 290 non-U.S.) surveys were evaluable. RESULTS: To evaluate men with an elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level more than 1 year after radical prostatectomy, 98% of respondents use digital rectal examination, 68% use bone scan, 54% use transrectal ultrasound with biopsy, 36% use abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scan, 31% use transrectal ultrasound without biopsy, 25% use prostatic acid phosphatase, 11% use monoclonal antibody scan, and 5% use abdominal or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Respondents evaluate men with an elevated or rising PSA within 1 year of radical prostatectomy similarly. To treat documented local recurrence, 81% of respondents recommend radiation therapy, 7% recommend orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, 6% recommend observation only, and 5% recommend combined androgen ablation. To treat documented distant recurrence, 50% recommend combined androgen ablation, 42% recommend orchiectomy or LHRH agonists, and 7% recommend observation only. To treat PSA-only recurrence, 54% recommend observation only, 16% recommend combined androgen ablation, 15% recommend orchiectomy or LHRH agonists, and 13% recommend radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of men whose radical prostatectomy failed varies among urologists and does not depend on time of recurrence. Radiation therapy is used by most urologists to treat local recurrence. Hormonal manipulation is used by more than 90% of urologists to treat distant recurrence. More than 50% of urologists recommend observation for men with biochemical-only recurrence.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how urologists evaluate and treat men who develop recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to 4467 American Urological Association members comprising 3205 U.S. and 1262 non-U.S. urologists randomly selected from a total membership of approximately 12,000. One thousand four hundred sixteen were returned and 1050 (760 U.S. and 290 non-U.S.) surveys were evaluable. RESULTS: To evaluate men with an elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level more than 1 year after radical prostatectomy, 98% of respondents use digital rectal examination, 68% use bone scan, 54% use transrectal ultrasound with biopsy, 36% use abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scan, 31% use transrectal ultrasound without biopsy, 25% use prostatic acid phosphatase, 11% use monoclonal antibody scan, and 5% use abdominal or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Respondents evaluate men with an elevated or rising PSA within 1 year of radical prostatectomy similarly. To treat documented local recurrence, 81% of respondents recommend radiation therapy, 7% recommend orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, 6% recommend observation only, and 5% recommend combined androgen ablation. To treat documented distant recurrence, 50% recommend combined androgen ablation, 42% recommend orchiectomy or LHRH agonists, and 7% recommend observation only. To treat PSA-only recurrence, 54% recommend observation only, 16% recommend combined androgen ablation, 15% recommend orchiectomy or LHRH agonists, and 13% recommend radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of men whose radical prostatectomy failed varies among urologists and does not depend on time of recurrence. Radiation therapy is used by most urologists to treat local recurrence. Hormonal manipulation is used by more than 90% of urologists to treat distant recurrence. More than 50% of urologists recommend observation for men with biochemical-only recurrence.
Authors: James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Brook E Harmon; Sue Heiney; Christine J Hebert; Susan E Steck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Zohar A Dotan; Fernando J Bianco; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Paul Fearn; Howard I Scher; Kevin W Kelly; Hui-Ni Chen; Heiko Schöder; Hedvig Hricak; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-05-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Rubén Algarra; Mateo Hevia; Antonio Tienza; Imanol Merino; José María Velis; Javier Zudaire; José Enrique Robles; Ignacio Pascual Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Hans Christian Rischke; Arnd O Schäfer; Ursula Nestle; Natalja Volegova-Neher; Karl Henne; Matthias R Benz; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Mathias Langer; Anca L Grosu Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.481