Literature DB >> 18270715

The normal post-surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Steven D Allen1, Alan Thompson, S Aslam Sohaib.   

Abstract

The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearances of recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy have been documented in the radiology literature; however little has been written on the range of normal post-operative appearances. Common routes of surgical access for radical prostatectomy include retropubic and transperineal, although newer minimally invasive methods are gaining increasing acceptance. Specifically the range of appearances of the anastomotic site, the prostatic bed, the position of the bladder base, periurethral tissue, levator sling, rectum and residual seminal vesicles (if present) are demonstrated. A non-enhancing low signal nodule is frequently seen at the vesicourethral anastomosis or within the seminal vesicle remnant and usually represents fibrosis. Appearances following different surgical accesses do not differ tremendously, although the retropubic fat pad is reduced or absent following a retropubic approach. Anterior rectal-wall scarring may be present following a transperineal approach. Other post-surgical findings that may mimic disease include a lymphocoele and injected bladder-neck bulking agent. Many patients referred for MRI following radical prostatectomy will have a pathological study showing disease recurrence, although in non-pathological studies the radiological features can differ significantly. It is important for the radiologist to be aware of the spectrum of normal post-surgical appearances so not to confuse these with locally recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270715     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0867-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.

Authors:  J V Joseph; R Rosenbaum; R Madeb; E Erturk; H R H Patel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; P G Schulam; R V Clayman; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Use of transrectal ultrasound in follow-up of postradical prostatectomy.

Authors:  N F Wasserman; P K Reddy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The use of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T Colombo; H Augustin; E Breinl; L Schips; G Hubmer
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-12

5.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Arnauld Villers; Philippe Puech; Damien Mouton; Xavier Leroy; Charles Ballereau; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Philipp Dahm; Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; Matthew D Young; Johannes Vieweg; David M Albala; David F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Advances in imaging in the postoperative patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen level.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Heiko Schöder; Darko Pucar; Eric Lis; Steven C Eberhardt; Chinyere N Onyebuchi; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  P M Lassen; W S Kearse
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?

Authors:  Howard J Korman; Patrick B Leu; Ray R Huang; Neal S Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view.

Authors:  E S Geary; T E Dendinger; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

1.  Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Ricarda M Bauer; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Olga Solyanik; Kerstin A Brocker; Sonja M Kirchhoff
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urodynamics and 3T MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Anne M Suskind; Charlene Neer; Hero Hussain; Jeffrey Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Prostate MR Imaging for Posttreatment Evaluation and Recurrence.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  MR imaging of treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Cecilia Wassberg; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling placement: first insight using MRI.

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Ricarda M Bauer; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Olga Soljanik; Sonja M Kirchhoff
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [Imaging for urinary incontinence].

Authors:  I Soljanik; K Brocker; O Solyanik; C G Stief; R Anding; R Kirschner-Hermanns
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Thierry Vitry; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  [Rational imaging in locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Beissert; R Lorenz; E W Gerharz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; John O L DeLancey; Hero K Hussain; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; Anne P Cameron
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.