| Literature DB >> 23112918 |
Maki Kobayashi1, Rie Hirahata, Shintaro Egusa, Mitsuru Fukuda.
Abstract
The effect of fermented soymilk on rats fed a high cholesterol diet was investigated to clarify the cholesterol-lowering function. Male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 7 weeks were fed a control diet (1% cholesterol, high cholesterol diet), high cholesterol diet containing 11.7% fermented soymilk diet (5% soy protein as final concentration, F-5), or high cholesterol diet containing 23.4% fermented soymilk diet (10% soy protein as final concentration, F-10) for 5 weeks. The liver weight and fat mass were decreased by the ingestion of fermented soymilk. The hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels in the F-5 and F-10 groups were significantly lowered compared to those in the control group. The plasma total cholesterol level of the F-10 group was significantly decreased. The expression of SREBP-2, a cholesterol synthesis-related gene, was significantly decreased in liver of the F-5 group, but the expression of CYP7a1, a cholesterol catabolism-related gene, was significantly increased. These results suggest that fermented soymilk can modulate the cholesterol metabolism in rats fed a high cholesterol diet.Entities:
Keywords: cholesterol; fermented soymilk; lipid metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23112918 PMCID: PMC3475240 DOI: 10.3390/nu4091304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition and energy of freeze-dried fermented soymilk.
| Component | Fermented soymilk | |
|---|---|---|
| % | Energy (kcal/100 g) | |
| Water | 4.9 | - |
| Protein | 42.9 | 171.6 |
| Fat | 36.8 | 331.2 |
| Carbohydrate | 2.6 | 10.4 |
| Dietary fiber | 7.2 | 14.4 |
| Minerals | 5.6 | - |
| Total energy | - | 527.6 |
Composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredient | Diet group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIN-93G * | C | F-5 | F-10 | |
| Casein 1 (%) | 20.0 | 20.0 | 14.2 | 8.4 |
| Cornstarch 1 (%) | 39.8 | 38.8 | 38.1 | 36.5 |
| Dextrinized cornstarch 1 (%) | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.0 | 12.5 |
| Sucrose 1 (%) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Soybean oil 1 (%) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 |
| Cellulose 1 (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-93G-MX) 1 (%) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) 1 (%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| Choline bitartrate 3 (%) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | |
| Cholesterol 2 (%) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Fermented soymilk 4 (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.7 | 23.4 |
| Total (%) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Energy (kcal/100 g) | 372.2 | 368.7 | 366.4 | 371.6 |
C, control; F-5, 11.7% of the control diet was replaced with dried fermented soymilk to 5% soy protein as final concentration; F-10, 23.4% of the control diet was replaced with fermented soymilk to 10% soy protein as final concentration; 1 Clea Japan, Osaka, Japan; 2 Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan; 3 Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan; 4 Marusan-Ai, Okazaki, Japan; * AIN-93G diet [21].
Initial and final body weights, food intake, food efficiency, total energy intake and tissue weights of rats fed on the experimental diets for 5 weeks.
| C | F-5 | F-10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 271.7 ± 3.5 a | 269.5 ± 3.4 a | 266.2 ± 2.9 a |
| Final body weight (g) | 422.1 ± 11.6 a | 401.1 ± 15.2 a | 394.9 ± 13.0 a |
| Food intake (g/day) | 19.8 ± 0.7 a | 19.1 ± 0.7 a | 18.3 ± 0.7 a |
| Food efficiency | |||
| (g b.w. gain/g diet) | 0.23 ± 0.01 a | 0.20 ± 0.02 a | 0.21 ± 0.01 a |
| Total energy uptake (kcal) | 2769.7 ± 96.3 a | 2651.9 ± 99.1 a | 2562.4 ± 97.2 a |
| Tissue weight (% b.w.) | |||
| Liver | 4.6 ± 0.1 a | 4.1 ± 0.1 ab | 3.6 ± 0.1 b |
| Cecum | 1.0 ± 0.1a | 1.0 ± 0.1 a | 1.2 ± 0.1 b |
Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. a,b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Comparison of increased amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat masses in the three groups. (A) visceral fat; (B) subcutaneous fat. The difference of each fat mass between the initial and end points of feeding period was measured. These fat mass regions were estimated by X-ray CT scan. Each value is the mean ± SE of 8 rats. a,b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Liver parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for 5 weeks. (A) hepatic cholesterol; (B) hepatic TG; (C) hepatic total lipid. Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. a,b,c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Plasma parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for 5 weeks. (A) plasma TC level; (B) non-HDL-C; (C) plasma TG level. Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. a,b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in the liver of rats fed experimental diets for 5 weeks. The expression of mRNA was quantitatively measured by real-time RT-PCR. Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. The data were normalized to GAPDH RNA expression and are presented as a ratio to the C value. Statistically significant compared with the control group (* p < 0.05; Student’s t-test).