| Literature DB >> 25514389 |
Maki Kobayashi1, Shintaro Egusa2, Mitsuru Fukuda3.
Abstract
A high cholesterol diet induces dyslipidemia. This study investigated whether isoflavone aglycones in lactic acid-fermented soy milk (LFS) improve lipid metabolism in rats fed a high cholesterol diet. Male Sprague-Dawley rats aged seven weeks were fed an AIN-93G diet, a 1% cholesterol diet (a high cholesterol diet), a high-cholesterol diet containing 4% isoflavone extract of LFS (LFS extract diet), a high-cholesterol diet containing 19.4% ethanol-washed LFS (ethanol-washed LFS diet, isoflavone-poor diet), or a high cholesterol diet containing 23.2% intact LFS (intact LFS diet) for five weeks. The plasma total cholesterol (TC) level was increased in the rats fed the LFS extract diet compared with those fed the high cholesterol diet. The TC level was decreased by the intact LFS and ethanol-washed LFS diets. The cholesterol-lowering effect was stronger in the rats fed the intact LFS diet than those fed the ethanol-washed LFS diet. The plasma triglyceride (TG) level was unchanged in the rats fed the LFS extract diet, but it decreased in rats fed the intact LFS and ethanol-washed LFS diets. Although, compared with the high cholesterol diet, the LFS extract and ethanol-washed LFS diets did not reduce hepatic cholesterol and TG, both levels were remarkably lowered by the intact LFS diet. These results suggest that the improvement in lipid metabolism of rats fed a high-cholesterol diet containing LFS isoflavone aglycones is not due to an independent effect but due to a cooperative effect with soy protein.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25514389 PMCID: PMC4276993 DOI: 10.3390/nu6125704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition and energy of several freeze-dried LFS samples.
| Component | LFS Extract | Ethanol-Washed LFS | Intact LFS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Energy | % | Energy (kcal/100 g) | % | Energy (kcal/100 g) | |
| Water | 2.9 | - | 6.7 | - | 1.6 | - |
| Protein | 8.1 | 32.4 | 51.8 | 207.2 | 43.3 | 173.2 |
| Fat | 1.1 | 9.9 | 22.2 | 199.8 | 31.9 | 287.1 |
| Carbohydrate | 70.3 | 281.2 | 4.2 | 16.8 | 4.7 | 18.8 |
| Dietary fiber | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.8 | 23.6 | 13.3 | 26.6 |
| Minerals | 17.6 | - | 3.3 | - | 5.3 | - |
| Total energy | - | 323.5 | - | 447.4 | - | 505.7 |
Composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredient | Diet Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C: AIN-93G * | H | E | W | F | |
| Casein 1 (%) | 20.0 | 20.0 | 19.6 | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Cornstarch 1 (%) | 39.8 | 38.8 | 36.3 | 38.0 | 38.0 |
| Dextrinized cornstarch 1 (%) | 13.2 | 13.2 | 12.1 | 12.7 | 12.6 |
| Sucrose 1 (%) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Soybean oil 1 (%) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 |
| Cellulose 1 (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-93G-MX) 1 (%) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) 1 (%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| Choline bitartrate 3 (%) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | |
| Cholesterol 2 (%) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Fermented soy milk extract 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Ethanol-washed fermented soy milk 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19.4 | 0.0 |
| Fermented soy milk 4 (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.2 |
| Total (%) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Energy (kcal/100 g) | 372.2 | 368.7 | 367.4 | 367.0 | 369.7 |
C, control; H, 1% cholesterol diet; E, 4% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with LFS extract; W, 19.4% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with dried ethanol-washed LFS to include 10% soy protein as a final concentration; F, 23.2% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with LFS to include 10% soy protein as a final concentration; 1 Clea Japan, Osaka, Japan; 2 Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan; 3 Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan; 4 Marusan-Ai, Okazaki, Japan; * AIN-93G diet [35].
Isoflavone composition of the experimental diets (mg/100g diet).
| Component | Diet Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| E | W | F | |
| Daidzin | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Malonyl daidzin | 2.1 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Acetyl daidzin | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Daidzein | 4.4 | 0.1 | 11.2 |
| Genistin | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Malonyl genistin | 4.4 | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Acetlyl genistin | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Genistein | 7.7 | 0.2 | 16.7 |
| Glycitin | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Malonyl glycitin | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Acetly glycitin | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Glycitein | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Total daizein (glycine + aglycone) | 7.4 | 0.4 | 12.9 |
| Total genistein (glycine + aglycone) | 12.9 | 0.6 | 18.9 |
| Total glycitein (glycine + aglycone) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| Total isoflavone(glycine + aglycone) | 20.6 | 1.1 | 32.4 |
| Total isoflavone aglycone | 12.3 | 0.3 | 28.3 |
| Aglycone ratio (%) | 59.6 | 30.9 | 87.3 |
E, 4% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with LFS extract; W, 19.4% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with dried ethanol-washed LFS to include 10% soy protein as a final concentration; F, 23.2% of the high cholesterol diet was replaced with LFS to include 10% soy protein as a final concentration.
Initial and final body weights, food intake, food efficiency, total energy intake, and tissue weights of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 1.
| Body Weight and Food Efficiency | C | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 253.7 ± 4.1 a | 257.2 ± 3.3 a | 256.6 ± 3.0 a |
| Final body weight (g) | 429.3 ± 10.1 a | 440.6 ± 10.5 a | 427.6 ± 10.4 a |
| Food intake (g/day) | 20.3 ± 0.6 a | 21.1 ± 0.7 a | 19.7 ± 0.6 a |
| Food efficiency (g b.w. gain/g diet) | 0.23 ± 0.01 a | 0.23 ± 0.02 a | 0.23 ± 0.01 a |
| Total energy uptake (kcal) | 2896.5 ± 75.7 a | 2992.9 ± 103.3 a | 2758.8 ± 74.4 a |
|
| |||
| Liver | 3.4 ± 0.1 a | 4.3 ± 0.1 b | 4.6 ± 0.1 b |
| Cecum | 0.8 ± 0.0 a | 0.8 ± 0.1 a | 1.1 ± 0.1 b |
Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. a, b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Liver parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 1: (A) hepatic cholesterol; (B) hepatic TG; (C) hepatic total lipid. Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. a, b, c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Plasma parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 1.
| Lipid Concentration | C | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 0W | 2.24 ± 0.10 a | 2.25 ± 0.13 a | 2.24 ± 0.07 a |
| 1W | 1.60 ± 0.06 a | 2.22 ± 0.06 b | 2.75 ± 0.07 c |
| 2W | 1.63 ± 0.11 a | 2.19 ± 0.03 b | 2.51 ± 0.16 b |
| 3W | 1.74 ± 0.11 a | 2.24 ± 0.05 b | 2.70 ± 0.14 c |
| 4W | 1.69 ± 0.11 a | 1.98 ± 0.05 ab | 2.42 ± 0.19 b |
| 5W | 1.86 ± 0.11 a | 2.19 ± 0.06 a | 2.75 ± 0.16 b |
|
| |||
| 0W | 0.72 ± 0.09 a | 0.71 ± 0.08 a | 0.73 ± 0.07 a |
| 1W | 1.23 ± 0.15 a | 1.44 ± 0.12 a | 1.58 ± 0.14 a |
| 2W | 1.53 ± 0.31 a | 1.73 ± 0.20 a | 1.26 ± 0.14 a |
| 3W | 1.41 ± 0.21 a | 1.59 ± 0.15 a | 1.36 ± 0.20 a |
| 4W | 1.48 ± 0.20 a | 1.44 ± 0.15 a | 1.32 ± 0.16 a |
| 5W | 1.37 ± 0.20 a | 1.19 ± 0.11a | 1.21 ± 0.22 a |
Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. a, b, c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in the livers of rats fed experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 1. The expression of mRNA was quantitatively measured by real-time RT-PCR. (A) CYP7a1; (B) SREBP-2; (C) FAS; (D) SREBP-1; (E) LXRα. Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. The data were normalized to GAPDH RNA expression and are presented as a ratio to the C value. a, b, c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Initial and final body weights, food intake, food efficiency, total energy intake, and tissue weights of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 2.
| Body Weight and Food Efficiency | C | H | W | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 271.7 ± 1.7 a | 273.1 ± 3.4 a | 269.4 ± 3.3 a | 271.7 ± 1.4 a |
| Final body weight (g) | 458.0 ± 10.0 a | 480.6 ± 12.8 a | 468.1 ± 10.2 a | 457.0 ± 4.2 a |
| Food intake (g/day) | 20.8 ± 0.5 a | 20.8 ± 0.5 a | 20.6 ± 0.4 a | 21.2 ± 0.4 a |
| Food efficiency (g b.w. gain/g diet) | 0.24 ± 0.01 a | 0.26 ± 0.02 a | 0.26 ± 0.01 a | 0.23 ± 0.01a |
| Total energy uptake (kcal) | 2932.6 ± 68.2 a | 2905.0 ± 67.6 a | 2835.5 ± 59.2 a | 2948.9 ± 64.8 a |
|
| ||||
| Liver | 3.8 ± 0.1 a | 4.9 ± 0.1 b | 4.5 ± 0.1 b | 4.1 ± 0.1 a |
| Cecum | 1.0 ± 0.0 a | 1.1 ± 0.1 a | 1.0 ± 0.0 a | 1.3 ± 0.1 b |
Each value is the mean ± SE for 8 rats. a, b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Comparison of increased amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat masses in three groups in Experiment 2: (A) visceral fat; (B) subcutaneous fat; (C) total fat. The difference of each fat mass between the initial and end points of the feeding period was measured. These fat mass regions were estimated by X-ray CT scan. Each value is the mean ± SE of eight rats. a, b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Liver parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 2: (A) hepatic cholesterol; (B) hepatic TG; (C) hepatic total lipid. Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. a, b, c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Plasma parameters of rats fed on the experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 2.
| Lipid Concentration | C | H | W | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 0W | 2.03 ± 0.09 a | 1.97 ± 0.08 a | 2.03 ± 0.13 a | 1.99 ± 0.13 a |
| 1W | 1.88 ± 0.08 a | 2.33 ± 0.09 b | 1.80 ± 0.10 ac | 1.48 ± 0.07 c |
| 2W | 1.68 ± 0.09 a | 2.25 ± 0.12 b | 1.65 ± 0.07 a | 1.34 ± 0.05 a |
| 3W | 1.80 ± 0.06 ac | 2.35 ± 0.13 b | 1.86 ± 0.08 a | 1.46 ± 0.07 c |
| 4W | 2.03 ± 0.07 a | 2.55 ± 0.15 b | 2.02 ± 0.09 a | 1.48 ± 0.07 c |
| 5W | 2.15 ± 0.10 a | 2.73 ± 0.18 b | 1.97 ± 0.07 a | 1.50 ± 0.08 c |
|
| ||||
| 0W | 0.49 ± 0.06 a | 0.53 ± 0.04 a | 0.56 ± 0.06 a | 0.52 ± 0.06 a |
| 1W | 0.54 ± 0.04 a | 1.43 ± 0.10 b | 1.09 ± 0.10 c | 0.80 ± 0.05 ac |
| 2W | 0.50 ± 0.05 a | 1.50 ± 0.14 b | 1.05 ± 0.07 c | 0.77 ± 0.05 ac |
| 3W | 0.44 ± 0.03 a | 1.54 ± 0.15 b | 1.14 ± 0.08 c | 0.69 ± 0.05 a |
| 4W | 0.62 ± 0.06 a | 1.79 ± 0.15 b | 1.42 ± 0.08 c | 0.89 ± 0.05 a |
| 5W | 0.49 ± 0.03 a | 1.79 ± 0.17 b | 1.21 ± 0.08 c | 0.75 ± 0.07 a |
|
| ||||
| 0W | 1.05 ± 0.19 a | 1.06 ± 0.06 a | 1.07 ± 0.15 a | 1.08 ± 0.09 a |
| 1W | 1.12 ± 0.09 a | 1.88 ± 0.12 b | 1.51 ± 0.26 ab | 1.42 ± 0.12 ab |
| 2W | 1.36 ± 0.09 a | 1.99 ± 0.18 b | 1.29 ± 0.11 a | 1.38 ± 0.16 a |
| 3W | 1.66 ± 0.11 ab | 2.18 ± 0.17 b | 1.51 ± 0.20 a | 1.34 ± 0.09 a |
| 4W | 1.63 ± 0.15 a | 1.97 ± 0.23 a | 1.51 ± 0.11 a | 1.43 ± 0.12 a |
| 5W | 1.40 ± 0.09 a | 1.89 ± 0.16 b | 1.43 ± 0.11 ab | 1.38 ± 0.10 a |
Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. a, b, c Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in the livers of rats fed experimental diets for five weeks in Experiment 2. The expression of mRNA was quantitatively measured by real-time RT-PCR. (A) CYP7a1; (B) SREBP-2; (C) HMGCR; (D) FAS; (E) SREBP-1; (F) CPT1a; (G) LXRα; (H) FXR; (I) LDLR. Each value is the mean ± SE for eight rats. The data were normalized to GAPDH RNA expression and are presented as a ratio to the C value. a, b Means not sharing a common superscript differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (p < 0.05).