Literature DB >> 24293094

Spatial heterogeneity in the response of the proximal femur to two lower-body resistance exercise regimens.

Thomas F Lang1, Isra H Saeed, Timothy Streeper, Julio Carballido-Gamio, Roy J Harnish, Lynda A Frassetto, Stuart M C Lee, Jean D Sibonga, Joyce H Keyak, Barry A Spiering, Carlos M Grodsinsky, Jacob J Bloomberg, Peter R Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Understanding the skeletal effects of resistance exercise involves delineating the spatially heterogeneous response of bone to load distributions from different muscle contractions. Bone mineral density (BMD) analyses may obscure these patterns by averaging data from tissues with variable mechanoresponse. To assess the proximal femoral response to resistance exercise, we acquired pretraining and posttraining quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images in 22 subjects (25-55 years, 9 males, 13 females) performing two resistance exercises for 16 weeks. One group (SQDL, n = 7) performed 4 sets each of squats and deadlifts, a second group (ABADD, n = 8) performed 4 sets each of standing hip abductions and adductions, and a third group (COMBO, n = 7) performed two sets each of squat/deadlift and abduction/adduction exercise. Subjects exercised three times weekly, and the load was adjusted each session to maximum effort. We used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to visualize BMD distributions. Hip strength computations used finite element modeling (FEM) with stance and fall loading conditions. We used QCT analysis for cortical and trabecular BMD, and cortical tissue volume. For muscle size and density, we analyzed the cross-sectional area (CSA) and mean Hounsfield unit (HU) in the hip extensor, flexor, abductor, and adductor muscle groups. Whereas SQDL increased vertebral BMD, femoral neck cortical BMD and volume, and stance hip strength, ABADD increased trochanteric cortical volume. The COMBO group showed no changes in any parameter. VBM showed different effects of ABADD and SQDL exercise, with the former causing focal changes of trochanteric cortical bone, and the latter showing diffuse changes in the femoral neck and head. ABADD exercise increased adductor CSA and HU, whereas SQDL exercise increased the hip extensor CSA and HU. In conclusion, we observed different proximal femoral bone and muscle tissue responses to SQDL and ABADD exercise. This study supports VBM and volumetric QCT (vQCT) to quantify the spatially heterogeneous effects of types of muscle contractions on bone.
© 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; FINITE ELEMENT MODELING; MUSCLE ATTENUATION; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RESISTANCE EXERCISE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24293094      PMCID: PMC4029859          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  27 in total

1.  Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas Lang; Adrian LeBlanc; Harlan Evans; Ying Lu; Harry Genant; Alice Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Effect of high-impact aerobics and strength training on BMD in young women aged 20-35 years.

Authors:  M T C Liang; W Braun; S L Bassin; D Dutto; A Pontello; N D Wong; T W Spalding; S B Arnaud
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Reduction in proximal femoral strength due to long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  J H Keyak; A K Koyama; A LeBlanc; Y Lu; T F Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Musculoskeletal adaptations to training with the advanced resistive exercise device.

Authors:  James A Loehr; Stuart M C Lee; Kirk L English; Jean Sibonga; Scott M Smith; Barry A Spiering; R Donald Hagan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.

Authors:  Joyce H Keyak; Tadashi S Kaneko; Jamshid Tehranzadeh; Harry B Skinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteoporoses.

Authors:  José Luis Ferretti; Gustavo Roberto Cointry; Ricardo Francisco Capozza; Harold M Frost
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.432

8.  Adaptation of the proximal femur to skeletal reloading after long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas F Lang; Adrian D Leblanc; Harlan J Evans; Ying Lu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Pelvic body composition measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with recent hip fracture.

Authors:  T Lang; A Koyama; C Li; J Li; Y Lu; I Saeed; E Gazze; J Keyak; T Harris; X Cheng
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Effects of resistance training and protein supplementation on bone turnover in young adult women.

Authors:  Nicole M Mullins; Wayne E Sinning
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 4.169

View more
  14 in total

1.  Stochastic modelling of muscle recruitment during activity.

Authors:  Saulo Martelli; Daniela Calvetti; Erkki Somersalo; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Joyce H Keyak; Mariana E Kersh; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.

Authors:  Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Michael Keiner; Christoph Mickel; Andre Sander; Elena Szilvas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Statistical Parametric Mapping of HR-pQCT Images: A Tool for Population-Based Local Comparisons of Micro-Scale Bone Features.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Galateia J Kazakia; Sundeep Khosla; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas F Lang; Andrew J Burghardt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Hip Fracture Discrimination Based on Statistical Multi-parametric Modeling (SMPM).

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Aihong Yu; Ling Wang; Yongbin Su; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas F Lang; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Sex differences in the spatial distribution of bone in relation to incident hip fracture: Findings from the AGES-Reykjavik study.

Authors:  Elisa A Marques; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Thor Aspelund; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Lenore Launer; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Thomas Lang; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Heterogeneous Spatial and Strength Adaptation of the Proximal Femur to Physical Activity: A Within-Subject Controlled Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Alyssa M Weatherholt; Joyce H Keyak; Chenxi Yan; Mariana E Kersh; Thomas F Lang; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Replacement of daily load attenuates but does not prevent changes to the musculoskeletal system during bed rest.

Authors:  Peter R Cavanagh; Andrea J Rice; Sara C Novotny; Kerim O Genc; Ricki K Englehaupt; Tammy M Owings; Bryan Comstock; Tamre Cardoso; Hakan Ilaslan; Scott M Smith; Angelo A Licata
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2016-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.