OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate a method, "Counseling in Dialogue" (CD), developed to increase the quality of counseling in youth mental health. Decisional conflict was used as indicator of the quality of counseling and shared decision-making. METHODS:94 children aged 2-12 years were randomized into a CD group and a care as usual (CU) group. In a before-and-after design decisional conflict was measured using the decisional conflict scale (DCS) for parents (N=133) and the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument for therapists (PDPAI, N=20). 81 children had follow-up data. RESULTS: Compared with parents of the CU group, parents of the CD group reported significantly less decisional conflict after counseling (difference mothers: -0.38 (95%CI -0.56; -0.19), p<.001; fathers: -0.22 (95%CI -0.44; -0.01), p=.045). 98% of the mothers and 96% of the fathers in the CD group accepted the recommended treatment, compared to 71% (fathers) and 77% (mothers) in the CU group, p<0.05. Decisional conflict of the therapists was low in both groups after counseling (difference: -0.03 (95%CI -0.19; 0.14), p=.741). CONCLUSION: The counseling procedure significantly lowered decisional conflict of the parents and promoted the acceptance of the recommended treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate a method, "Counseling in Dialogue" (CD), developed to increase the quality of counseling in youth mental health. Decisional conflict was used as indicator of the quality of counseling and shared decision-making. METHODS: 94 children aged 2-12 years were randomized into a CD group and a care as usual (CU) group. In a before-and-after design decisional conflict was measured using the decisional conflict scale (DCS) for parents (N=133) and the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument for therapists (PDPAI, N=20). 81 children had follow-up data. RESULTS: Compared with parents of the CU group, parents of the CD group reported significantly less decisional conflict after counseling (difference mothers: -0.38 (95%CI -0.56; -0.19), p<.001; fathers: -0.22 (95%CI -0.44; -0.01), p=.045). 98% of the mothers and 96% of the fathers in the CD group accepted the recommended treatment, compared to 71% (fathers) and 77% (mothers) in the CU group, p<0.05. Decisional conflict of the therapists was low in both groups after counseling (difference: -0.03 (95%CI -0.19; 0.14), p=.741). CONCLUSION: The counseling procedure significantly lowered decisional conflict of the parents and promoted the acceptance of the recommended treatment.
Authors: Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Margot J Metz; Marjolein A Veerbeek; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Edwin de Beurs; Aartjan T F Beekman Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Patricia A Lee King; Julie A Cederbaum; Seth Kurzban; Timothy Norton; Steven C Palmer; James C Coyne Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Margot J Metz; Gerdien C Franx; Marjolein A Veerbeek; Edwin de Beurs; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Aartjan T F Beekman Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 3.630