Literature DB >> 25556196

Role of patient treatment beliefs and provider characteristics in establishing patient-provider relationships.

Patricia A Lee King1, Julie A Cederbaum2, Seth Kurzban2, Timothy Norton2, Steven C Palmer3, James C Coyne3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive patient-provider relationships have been associated with improved depression treatment outcomes. Little is known about how patient treatment beliefs influence patient-provider relationships, specifically treatment alliance and shared decision making in primary care (PC).
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between patient treatment beliefs and patient-provider relationships by gender, race and current depression.
METHODS: We used a deductive parallel convergent mixed method design with cross-sectional data. Participants were 227 Black and White patients presenting with depression symptoms in PC settings. Individuals were randomized into either a quantitative survey (n = 198) or qualitative interview (n = 29) group. We used multiple ordinary least squares regression to evaluate the association between patient beliefs, as measured by the Treatment Beliefs Scale and the Medication Beliefs Scale, and treatment alliance or shared decision making. We concurrently conducted thematic analyses of qualitative semistructured interview data to explicate the nature of patient-provider relationships.
RESULTS: We found that patients who believed their provider would respectfully facilitate depression treatment reported greater bond, openness and shared decision making with their provider. We also identified qualitative themes of physicians listening to, caring about and respecting patients. Empathy and emotive expression increased patient trust in PC providers as facilitators of depression treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This work systematically demonstrated what many providers anecdotally believe: PC environments in which individuals feel safe sharing psychological distress are essential to early identification and treatment of depression. Interprofessional skills-based training in attentiveness and active listening may influence the effectiveness of depression intervention.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression/mood disorders; doctor–patient relationship; health disparities; primary care; quality of care.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25556196      PMCID: PMC4371891          DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmu085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  18 in total

Review 1.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects in short-term individual therapy.

Authors:  Anthony S Joyce; John S Ogrodniczuk; William E Piper; Mary McCallum
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-08

4.  The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

Authors:  J L Krupnick; S M Sotsky; S Simmens; J Moyer; I Elkin; J Watkins; P A Pilkonis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-06

5.  Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM).

Authors:  R Agnew-Davies; W B Stiles; G E Hardy; M Barkham; D A Shapiro
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-05

6.  Pretreatment expectations, interpersonal functioning, and symptoms in the prediction of the therapeutic alliance across supportive-expressive psychotherapy and cognitive therapy.

Authors:  M B Connolly Gibbons; P Crits-Christoph; C de la Cruz; J P Barber; L Siqueland; M Gladis
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2003-03

Review 7.  Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome?

Authors:  Roger P Greenberg; Michael J Constantino; Noah Bruce
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10

8.  Are physicians' attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors?

Authors:  Mary Catherine Beach; Debra L Roter; Nae-Yuh Wang; Patrick S Duggan; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-21

9.  What patients want: A content analysis of key qualities that influence patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Roger Anderson; Angela Barbara; Steven Feldman
Journal:  J Med Pract Manage       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

10.  The implications of race and ethnicity for shared decision-making.

Authors:  Rob Whitley
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2009
View more
  4 in total

1.  The effect of nurse-led group discussions by race on depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ubolrat Piamjariyakul; Noreen C Thompson; Christy Russell; Carol E Smith
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Predisposition for Empathy, Intercultural Sensitivity, and Intentions for Using Motivational Interviewing in First Year Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Gladys Ekong; Jan Kavookjian; Amber Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Measuring patient safety culture in maternal and child health institutions in China: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Weiwei Liu; Huifeng Shi; Chaojie Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Incorporating the patient-centered approach into clinical practice helps improve quality of care in cases of hypertension: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nida Buawangpong; Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish; Wichuda Jiraporncharoen; Nisachol Dejkriengkraikul; Pakorn Sagulkoo; Chanapat Pateekhum; Chaisiri Angkurawaranon
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.