Literature DB >> 33890174

A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in child and youth mental health: synthesising the use of theory, intervention functions, and behaviour change techniques.

Daniel Hayes1,2,3, Julian Edbrooke-Childs4, Rosa Town4, Miranda Wolpert4, Nick Midgley5.   

Abstract

Reviews around interventions to improve shared decision making (SDM) for child and youth mental health have produced inconclusive findings on what approaches increase participation. Importantly, the previous reviews did not explore the use of theory, as well as mechanisms of change (intervention functions) and active units of change (behaviour change techniques). The aim of this review was to explore these factors and ascertain how, if at all, these contribute to SDM. Five databases were searched up until April 2020. Studies met inclusion criteria if they were: (a) an intervention to facilitate SDM; (b) aimed at children, adolescence, or young people aged up to 25, with a mental health difficulty, or their parents/guardians; and (c) included a control group. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, study design, intervention, theoretical background, intervention functions, behaviour change techniques, and SDM. Quality assessment of the studies was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Eight different interventions met inclusion criteria. The role of theory to increase SDM remains unclear. Specific intervention functions, such as 'education' on SDM and treatment options and 'environmental restructuring' using decision aids, are being used in SDM interventions, as well as 'training' for clinicians. Similarly, behaviour change techniques linked to these, such as 'adding objects to the environment', 'discussing pros/cons', and clinicians engaging in 'behavioural practice/rehearsal'. However, as most studies scored low on the quality assessment criteria, as well as a small number of studies included and a low number of behaviour change techniques utilised, links between behaviour change techniques, intervention functions and increased participation remain tentative. Intervention developers and clinicians may wish to consider specific intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to facilitate SDM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviour change; Child mental health; Interventions; Shared decision making; Youth mental health

Year:  2021        PMID: 33890174     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01782-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  36 in total

1.  Developing a framework to support shared decision making for youth mental health medication treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Crickard; Megan S O'Brien; Charles A Rapp; Cheryl L Holmes
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-06-23

2.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Ian S Watt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-27

4.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  What approaches for promoting shared decision-making are used in child mental health? A scoping review.

Authors:  Helen Cheng; Daniel Hayes; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Kate Martin; Louise Chapman; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2017-07-28

6.  Age changes in weight, body fat and fat free mass among the adult Scheduled caste females of Punjab.

Authors:  S Sidhu; L S Sidhu
Journal:  Z Morphol Anthropol       Date:  1987

Review 7.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-07-26

8.  In the genes or in the stars? Children's competence to consent.

Authors:  P Alderson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rachel Davis; Rona Campbell; Zoe Hildon; Lorna Hobbs; Susan Michie
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 10.  A scoping review and assessment of essential elements of shared decision-making of parent-involved interventions in child and adolescent mental health.

Authors:  Shaun Liverpool; Brent Pereira; Daniel Hayes; Miranda Wolpert; Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  2 in total

1.  Conflicted Anger as a Central Dynamic in Depression in Adolescents-A Double Case Study.

Authors:  Arne Kristian Henriksen; Randi Ulberg; Bjørn Peter Urban Tallberg; André Løvgren; Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Predictors, Moderators, and Mediators Associated With Treatment Outcome in Randomized Clinical Trials Among Adolescents With Depression: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Darren B Courtney; Priya Watson; Karolin R Krause; Benjamin W C Chan; Kathryn Bennett; Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel; Terri Rodak; Kirsten Neprily; Tabitha Zentner; Peter Szatmari
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.