Literature DB >> 23096774

Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.

A Lauren Crain1, Brian C Martinson, Carol R Thrush.   

Abstract

The Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) is a validated tool to facilitate promotion of research integrity and research best practices. This work uses the SORC to assess shared and individual perceptions of the research climate in universities and academic departments and relate these perceptions to desirable and undesirable research practices. An anonymous web- and mail-based survey was administered to randomly selected biomedical and social science faculty and postdoctoral fellows in the United States. Respondents reported their perceptions of the research climates at their universities and primary departments, and the frequency with which they engaged in desirable and undesirable research practices. More positive individual perceptions of the research climate in one's university or department were associated with higher likelihoods of desirable, and lower likelihoods of undesirable, research practices. Shared perceptions of the research climate tended to be similarly predictive of both desirable and undesirable research practices as individuals' deviations from these shared perceptions. Study results supported the central prediction that more positive SORC-measured perceptions of the research climate were associated with more positive reports of research practices. There were differences with respect to whether shared or individual climate perceptions were related to desirable or undesirable practices but the general pattern of results provide empirical evidence that the SORC is predictive of self-reported research behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23096774      PMCID: PMC3594440          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  14 in total

1.  A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Edward J Hackett
Journal:  J Higher Educ       Date:  1994 May-Jun

2.  Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior?

Authors:  Elizabeth Heitman; Lida Anestidou; Cara Olsen; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; A Lauren Crain; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael S Teitelbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Repairing research integrity.

Authors:  Sandra L Titus; James A Wells; Lawrence J Rhoades
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Institutions' expectations for researchers' self-funding, federal grant holding, and private industry involvement: manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond De Vries
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comment on "Improving research misconduct policies" by Redman & Caplan.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; C K Gunsalus
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.

Authors:  Vanja Pupovac; Snježana Prijić-Samaržija; Mladen Petrovečki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Main outcomes of an RCT to pilot test reporting and feedback to foster research integrity climates in the VA.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; David C Mohr; Martin P Charns; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; Ann Bangerter; Hanna E Bloomfield; Richard Owen; Carol R Thrush
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Perceptions of Research Integrity Climate in Hungarian Universities: Results from A Survey among Academic Researchers.

Authors:  Anna Catharina Vieira Armond; Péter Kakuk
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.777

6.  Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; John T Chibnall; Kari A Baldwin; Raymond C Tait; Jillon S Vander Wal; James M DuBois
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Climate of Respect Evaluation in ICUs: Development of an Instrument (ICU-CORE).

Authors:  Mary Catherine Beach; Rachel Topazian; Kitty S Chan; Jeremy Sugarman; Gail Geller
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Tammy English; Matthew Wroblewski; James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.