Literature DB >> 23092873

Phase I and pharmacologic trial of cytosine arabinoside with the selective checkpoint 1 inhibitor Sch 900776 in refractory acute leukemias.

Judith E Karp1, Brian M Thomas, Jacqueline M Greer, Christopher Sorge, Steven D Gore, Keith W Pratz, B Douglas Smith, Karen S Flatten, Kevin Peterson, Paula Schneider, Karen Mackey, Tomoko Freshwater, Mark J Levis, Michael A McDevitt, Hetty E Carraway, Douglas E Gladstone, Margaret M Showel, Sabine Loechner, David A Parry, Jo Ann Horowitz, Randi Isaacs, Scott H Kaufmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Incorporation of cytarabine into DNA activates checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), which stabilizes stalled replication forks, induces S-phase slowing, and diminishes cytarabine cytotoxicity. The selective Chk1 inhibitor SCH 900776 abrogates cytarabine-induced S-phase arrest and enhances cytarabine cytotoxicity in acute leukemia cell lines and leukemic blasts in vitro. To extend these findings to the clinical setting, we have conducted a phase I study of cytarabine and SCH 900776. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Twenty-four adults with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias received timed sequential, continuous infusion cytarabine 2 g/m(2) over 72 hours (667 mg/m(2)/24 hours) beginning on day 1 and again on day 10. SCH 900776 was administered as a 15- to 30-minute infusion on days 2, 3, 11, and 12. The starting dose of SCH 900776 was 10 mg/m(2)/dose.
RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities consisting of corrected QT interval prolongation and grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred at 140 mg flat dosing (dose level 5, equivalent to 80 mg/m(2)). Complete remissions occurred in 8 of 24 (33%) patients, with 7 of 8 at 40 mg/m(2) or higher. SCH 900776 did not accumulate at any dose level. Marrow blasts obtained pretreatment and during therapy showed increased phosphorylation of H2Ax after SCH 900776 beginning at 40 mg/m(2), consistent with unrepaired DNA damage.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support a randomized phase II trial of cytarabine +/- SCH 900776 at a recommended flat dose of 100 mg (equivalent to 56 mg/m(2)) for adults with poor-risk leukemias. The trial (SP P05247) was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00907517. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23092873      PMCID: PMC3596113          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

1.  Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of bolus-infusion flavopiridol followed by cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone for acute leukemias.

Authors:  Judith E Karp; B Douglas Smith; Linda S Resar; Jacqueline M Greer; Amanda Blackford; Ming Zhao; Dwella Moton-Nelson; Katrina Alino; Mark J Levis; Steven D Gore; Biju Joseph; Hetty Carraway; Michael A McDevitt; Lorena Bagain; Karen Mackey; Janet Briel; L Austin Doyle; John J Wright; Michelle A Rudek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Cytarabine dose for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bob Löwenberg; Thomas Pabst; Edo Vellenga; Wim van Putten; Harry C Schouten; Carlos Graux; Augustin Ferrant; Pieter Sonneveld; Bart J Biemond; Alois Gratwohl; Georgine E de Greef; Leo F Verdonck; Martijn R Schaafsma; Michael Gregor; Matthias Theobald; Urs Schanz; Johan Maertens; Gert J Ossenkoppele
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Phase I and pharmacological study of cytarabine and tanespimycin in relapsed and refractory acute leukemia.

Authors:  Scott H Kaufmann; Judith E Karp; Mark R Litzow; Ruben A Mesa; William Hogan; David P Steensma; Karen S Flatten; David A Loegering; Paula A Schneider; Kevin L Peterson; Matthew J Maurer; B Douglas Smith; Jacqueline Greer; Yuhong Chen; Joel M Reid; S Percy Ivy; Matthew M Ames; Alex A Adjei; Charles Erlichman; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Heat shock protein 90 inhibition sensitizes acute myelogenous leukemia cells to cytarabine.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; David Loegering; Heather L Powell; Karen Flatten; Sonnet J H Arlander; Nga T Dai; Michael P Heldebrant; Benjamin T Vroman; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp; Cynthia J Ten Eyck; Charles Erlichman; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Targeting the replication checkpoint using SCH 900776, a potent and functionally selective CHK1 inhibitor identified via high content screening.

Authors:  Timothy J Guzi; Kamil Paruch; Michael P Dwyer; Marc Labroli; Frances Shanahan; Nicole Davis; Lorena Taricani; Derek Wiswell; Wolfgang Seghezzi; Ervin Penaflor; Bhagyashree Bhagwat; Wei Wang; Danling Gu; Yunsheng Hsieh; Suining Lee; Ming Liu; David Parry
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Relationship of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine in plasma to 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine 5'-triphosphate levels in leukemic cells during treatment with high-dose 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine.

Authors:  J O Liliemark; W Plunkett; D O Dixon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  ATM and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex respond to nucleoside analogue-induced stalled replication forks and contribute to drug resistance.

Authors:  Brett Ewald; Deepa Sampath; William Plunkett
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu H Estey; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Alan K Burnett; Hervé Dombret; Pierre Fenaux; David Grimwade; Richard A Larson; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel A Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Constitutive activation of the DNA damage signaling pathway in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype: potential importance for checkpoint targeting therapy.

Authors:  Cindy Cavelier; Christine Didier; Naïs Prade; Véronique Mansat-De Mas; Stéphane Manenti; Christian Recher; Cécile Demur; Bernard Ducommun
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network.

Authors:  Yun Dai; Steven Grant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  53 in total

1.  XPO1 Inhibition using Selinexor Synergizes with Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Targeting DNA Repair and Restoring Topoisomerase IIα to the Nucleus.

Authors:  Parvathi Ranganathan; Trinayan Kashyap; Xueyan Yu; Xiaomei Meng; Tzung-Huei Lai; Betina McNeil; Bhavana Bhatnagar; Sharon Shacham; Michael Kauffman; Adrienne M Dorrance; William Blum; Deepa Sampath; Yosef Landesman; Ramiro Garzon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 following gemcitabine-mediated S phase arrest results in CDC7- and CDK2-dependent replication catastrophe.

Authors:  Nicholas J H Warren; Alan Eastman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition combine synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia ex vivo.

Authors:  Leena Chaudhuri; Nicole D Vincelette; Brian D Koh; Ryan M Naylor; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; Amanda McNally; Ivana Gojo; Judith E Karp; Ruben A Mesa; Lisa O Sproat; James M Bogenberger; Scott H Kaufmann; Raoul Tibes
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Exploiting replicative stress to treat cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Claus Storgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) mechanisms of action: emerging insights.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Yun Dai; Steven Grant
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Edward Sausville; Patricia Lorusso; Michael Carducci; Judith Carter; Mary F Quinn; Lisa Malburg; Nilofer Azad; David Cosgrove; Richard Knight; Peter Barker; Sonya Zabludoff; Felix Agbo; Patricia Oakes; Adrian Senderowicz
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Targeted inhibition of ATR or CHEK1 reverses radioresistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells with distal chromosome arm 11q loss.

Authors:  Madhav Sankunny; Rahul A Parikh; Dale W Lewis; William E Gooding; William S Saunders; Susanne M Gollin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Inhibition of homologous recombination with vorinostat synergistically enhances ganciclovir cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Brendon Ladd; Jeffrey J Ackroyd; J Kevin Hicks; Christine E Canman; Sheryl A Flanagan; Donna S Shewach
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-11-11

Review 9.  Structure-based design, discovery and development of checkpoint kinase inhibitors as potential anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Thomas P Matthews; Alan M Jones; Ian Collins
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 10.  The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design.

Authors:  Ruth Thompson; Alan Eastman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.