BACKGROUND: In preclinical studies the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor tanespimycin induced down-regulation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and other client proteins as well as increased sensitivity of acute leukemia cells to cytarabine. We report here the results of a phase I and pharmacological study of the cytarabine + tanespimycin combination in adults with recurrent or refractory acute leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients received cytarabine 400 mg/m(2)/day continuously for 5 days and tanespimycin infusions at escalating doses on days 3 and 6. Marrow mononuclear cells harvested before therapy, immediately prior to tanespimycin, and 24 hours later were examined by immunoblotting for Hsp70 and multiple Hsp90 clients. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated at five dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose was cytarabine 400 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days along with tanespimycin 300 mg/m(2) on days 3 and 6. Treatment-related adverse events included disseminated intravascular coagulation (grades 3 and 5), acute respiratory distress syndrome (grade 4), and myocardial infarction associated with prolonged exposure to tanespimycin and its active metabolite 17-aminogeldanamycin. Among 21 evaluable patients, there were two complete and four partial remissions. Elevations of Hsp70, a marker used to assess Hsp90 inhibition in other studies, were observed in more than 80% of samples harvested 24 hours after tanespimycin, but down-regulation of Chk1 and other Hsp90 client proteins was modest. CONCLUSIONS: Because exposure to potentially effective concentrations occurs only for a brief time in vivo, at clinically tolerable doses tanespimycin has little effect on resistance-mediating client proteins in relapsed leukemia and exhibits limited activity in combination with cytarabine. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00098423).
BACKGROUND: In preclinical studies the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor tanespimycin induced down-regulation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and other client proteins as well as increased sensitivity of acute leukemia cells to cytarabine. We report here the results of a phase I and pharmacological study of the cytarabine + tanespimycin combination in adults with recurrent or refractory acute leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients received cytarabine 400 mg/m(2)/day continuously for 5 days and tanespimycin infusions at escalating doses on days 3 and 6. Marrow mononuclear cells harvested before therapy, immediately prior to tanespimycin, and 24 hours later were examined by immunoblotting for Hsp70 and multiple Hsp90 clients. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated at five dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose was cytarabine 400 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days along with tanespimycin 300 mg/m(2) on days 3 and 6. Treatment-related adverse events included disseminated intravascular coagulation (grades 3 and 5), acute respiratory distress syndrome (grade 4), and myocardial infarction associated with prolonged exposure to tanespimycin and its active metabolite 17-aminogeldanamycin. Among 21 evaluable patients, there were two complete and four partial remissions. Elevations of Hsp70, a marker used to assess Hsp90 inhibition in other studies, were observed in more than 80% of samples harvested 24 hours after tanespimycin, but down-regulation of Chk1 and other Hsp90 client proteins was modest. CONCLUSIONS: Because exposure to potentially effective concentrations occurs only for a brief time in vivo, at clinically tolerable doses tanespimycin has little effect on resistance-mediating client proteins in relapsed leukemia and exhibits limited activity in combination with cytarabine. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00098423).
Authors: Udai Banerji; Anne O'Donnell; Michelle Scurr; Simon Pacey; Sarah Stapleton; Yasmin Asad; Laura Simmons; Alison Maloney; Florence Raynaud; Maeli Campbell; Michael Walton; Sunil Lakhani; Stanley Kaye; Paul Workman; Ian Judson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sonnet J H Arlander; Sara J Felts; Jill M Wagner; Bridget Stensgard; David O Toft; Larry M Karnitz Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-12-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Fei Guo; Kathy Rocha; Purva Bali; Michael Pranpat; Warren Fiskus; Sandhya Boyapalle; Sandhya Kumaraswamy; Maria Balasis; Benjamin Greedy; E Simon M Armitage; Nicholas Lawrence; Kapil Bhalla Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ruben A Mesa; David Loegering; Heather L Powell; Karen Flatten; Sonnet J H Arlander; Nga T Dai; Michael P Heldebrant; Benjamin T Vroman; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp; Cynthia J Ten Eyck; Charles Erlichman; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz Journal: Blood Date: 2005-03-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Scott H Kaufmann; Judith E Karp; Louis Letendre; Timothy J Kottke; Stephanie Safgren; Jackie Greer; Ivana Gojo; Pamela Atherton; Phyllis A Svingen; David A Loegering; Mark R Litzow; Jeff A Sloan; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Alex A Adjei; Charles Erlichman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Erin Schenk; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Donald Northfelt; David O Toft; Matthew M Ames; Michael Menefee; Daniel Satele; Rui Qin; Charles Erlichman Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-03-31 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Katrina S Pedersen; George P Kim; Nathan R Foster; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Charles Erlichman; Robert R McWilliams Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Judith E Karp; Brian M Thomas; Jacqueline M Greer; Christopher Sorge; Steven D Gore; Keith W Pratz; B Douglas Smith; Karen S Flatten; Kevin Peterson; Paula Schneider; Karen Mackey; Tomoko Freshwater; Mark J Levis; Michael A McDevitt; Hetty E Carraway; Douglas E Gladstone; Margaret M Showel; Sabine Loechner; David A Parry; Jo Ann Horowitz; Randi Isaacs; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Erin L Schenk; Brian D Koh; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; David Parry; Allan D Hess; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp; Larry M Karnitz; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Erwin G Van Meir; Binghe Wang; Sarah K Burroughs; Stefan Kaluz; Danzhu Wang; Ke Wang Journal: Future Med Chem Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.808