Literature DB >> 23593991

The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design.

Ruth Thompson1, Alan Eastman.   

Abstract

Many anticancer agents damage DNA and activate cell cycle checkpoints that permit time for the cells to repair their DNA and recover. These checkpoints have undergone intense investigation as potential therapeutic targets and Chk1 inhibitors have emerged as promising novel therapeutic agents. Chk1 was initially recognized as a regulator of the G2/M checkpoint, but has since been demonstrated to have additional roles in replication fork stability, replication origin firing and homologous recombination. Inhibition of these pathways can dramatically sensitize cells to some antimetabolites. Current clinical trials with Chk1 inhibitors are primarily focusing on their combination with gemcitabine. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of, and emerging uses for Chk1 inhibitors as single agents and in combination with antimetabolites. We also discuss the pharmacodynamic issues that need to be addressed in attaining maximum efficacy in vivo. Following administration of gemcitabine to mice and humans, tumour cells accumulate in S phase for at least 24 h before recovering. In addition, stalled replication forks evolve over time to become more Chk1 dependent. We emphasize the need to assess cell cycle perturbation and Chk1 dependence of tumours in patients administered gemcitabine. These assessments will define the optimum dose and schedule for administration of these drug combinations.
© 2013 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chk1; cell cycle checkpoints; gemcitabine; homologous recombination; hydroxyurea; pharmacodynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23593991      PMCID: PMC3769664          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  76 in total

1.  Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Mick Woodcock; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chk1 inhibition after replicative stress activates a double strand break response mediated by ATM and DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  Samuel McNeely; Chiara Conti; Tahir Sheikh; Himali Patel; Sonya Zabludoff; Yves Pommier; Gary Schwartz; Archie Tse
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Differences in the DNA replication of unicellular eukaryotes and metazoans: known unknowns.

Authors:  Alessia Errico; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Manuel Luís Orta; Natalia Issaeva; Niklas Schultz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  The preclinical pharmacology and therapeutic activity of the novel CHK1 inhibitor SAR-020106.

Authors:  Michael I Walton; Paul D Eve; Angela Hayes; Melanie Valenti; Alexis De Haven Brandon; Gary Box; Kathy J Boxall; G Wynne Aherne; Suzanne A Eccles; Florence I Raynaud; David H Williams; John C Reader; Ian Collins; Michelle D Garrett
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Cisplatin-induced DNA damage activates replication checkpoint signaling components that differentially affect tumor cell survival.

Authors:  Jill M Wagner; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Carol E Bansbach; Rémy Bétous; Courtney A Lovejoy; Gloria G Glick; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  The decision to enter mitosis: feedback and redundancy in the mitotic entry network.

Authors:  Arne Lindqvist; Verónica Rodríguez-Bravo; René H Medema
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  John Atkinson; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  58 in total

1.  Cancer therapeutics revisited; novel drugs targeting cell signalling pathways, genome wide association studies and other trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Lionel D Lewis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 following gemcitabine-mediated S phase arrest results in CDC7- and CDK2-dependent replication catastrophe.

Authors:  Nicholas J H Warren; Alan Eastman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Cell Cycle Regulation and Melanoma.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Grant McArthur
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Sphingolipids in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Brittany Carroll; Jane Catalina Donaldson; Lina Obeid
Journal:  Adv Biol Regul       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  The CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib Exhibits Monotherapy Activity in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Models and Sensitizes to PARP Inhibition.

Authors:  Kalindi Parmar; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Zhigang C Wang; Sangeetha Palakurthi; Paul T Kirschmeier; Chunyu Yang; Larissa A Sambel; Anniina Färkkilä; Elizaveta Reznichenko; Hunter D Reavis; Connor E Dunn; Lee Zou; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce F Liu; Alan D D'Andrea; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Combination Platinum-based and DNA Damage Response-targeting Cancer Therapy: Evolution and Future Directions.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Likun Li; Ana M Aparicio; Paul G Corn; Jeri Kim; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Targeting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the c-Myb-regulated DNA damage response pathway in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Likun Li; Wenjun Chang; Guang Yang; Chengzhen Ren; Sanghee Park; Theodoros Karantanos; Styliani Karanika; Jianxiang Wang; Jianhua Yin; Parantu K Shah; Hirayama Takahiro; Masato Dobashi; Wenling Zhang; Eleni Efstathiou; Sankar N Maity; Ana M Aparicio; Elsa M Li Ning Tapia; Patricia Troncoso; Bradley Broom; Lianchun Xiao; Hyun-Sung Lee; Ju-Seog Lee; Paul G Corn; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 8.  Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Increasing cisplatin sensitivity by schedule-dependent inhibition of AKT and Chk1.

Authors:  Lei Duan; Ricardo E Perez; Michael Hansen; Steven Gitelis; Carl G Maki
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  A Network of Conserved Synthetic Lethal Interactions for Exploration of Precision Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Rohith Srivas; John Paul Shen; Chih Cheng Yang; Su Ming Sun; Jianfeng Li; Andrew M Gross; James Jensen; Katherine Licon; Ana Bojorquez-Gomez; Kristin Klepper; Justin Huang; Daniel Pekin; Jia L Xu; Huwate Yeerna; Vignesh Sivaganesh; Leonie Kollenstart; Haico van Attikum; Pedro Aza-Blanc; Robert W Sobol; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.