Literature DB >> 21410371

Cytarabine dose for acute myeloid leukemia.

Bob Löwenberg1, Thomas Pabst, Edo Vellenga, Wim van Putten, Harry C Schouten, Carlos Graux, Augustin Ferrant, Pieter Sonneveld, Bart J Biemond, Alois Gratwohl, Georgine E de Greef, Leo F Verdonck, Martijn R Schaafsma, Michael Gregor, Matthias Theobald, Urs Schanz, Johan Maertens, Gert J Ossenkoppele.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytarabine (ara-C) is an important drug in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine (2000 to 3000 mg per square meter of body-surface area) is toxic but results in higher rates of relapse-free survival than does the conventional dose of 100 to 400 mg per square meter. Intermediate dose levels have not been thoroughly evaluated.
METHODS: We compared two induction regimens in patients 18 to 60 years of age (median, 49) who had newly diagnosed AML. The intermediate-dose group, totaling 431 patients, received cytarabine at a dose of 200 mg per square meter given by continuous intravenous infusion for 24 hours during cycle 1 of induction therapy and 1000 mg per square meter by infusion for 3 hours twice daily during cycle 2 of induction therapy. The high-dose group, totaling 429 patients, received a dose-escalated regimen of 1000 mg of cytarabine per square meter every 12 hours in cycle 1 and 2000 mg per square meter twice daily in cycle 2. Patients with a complete response did not receive additional cytarabine but received consolidation therapy in a third cycle of chemotherapy (mitoxantrone-etoposide) or underwent autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Complete remission rates, survival rates, and toxic effects were assessed for each treatment group.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences were noted between the intermediate-dose group and the high-dose group with respect to complete remission rates (80% and 82%, respectively), probability of relapse, event-free survival at 5 years (34% and 35%), or overall survival (40% and 42%). High-dose cytarabine provided no clear advantage in any prognostic subgroup. The high-dose treatment resulted in higher incidences of grade 3 and grade 4 toxic effects (in cycle 1), prolonged hospitalization, and delayed neutrophil recovery (in cycle 2) and platelet recovery (in cycles 2 and 3).
CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy with cytarabine at the lower dose already produced maximal antileukemic effects for all response end points, suggesting a plateau in the dose-response relationship above this dose level. High-dose cytarabine results in excessive toxic effects without therapeutic benefit. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR230.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21410371     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  123 in total

1.  Haematological cancer: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  The role of transporters in the toxicity of nucleoside and nucleotide analogs.

Authors:  Christopher A Koczor; Rebecca A Torres; William Lewis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Long-term results of a randomized phase 3 trial comparing idarubicin and daunorubicin in younger patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  C Récher; M C Béné; B Lioure; A Pigneux; N Vey; J Delaunay; I Luquet; M Hunault; D Guyotat; D Bouscary; N Fegueux; E Jourdan; S Lissandre; M Escoffre-Barbe; C Bonmati; E Randriamalala; R Guièze; M Ojeda-Uribe; F Dreyfus; J L Harousseau; J Y Cahn; N Ifrah; P Guardiola
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Acute myeloid leukemia with monosomal karyotype at the far end of the unfavorable prognostic spectrum.

Authors:  Dimitri A Breems; Bob Löwenberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Upfront therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jenna Vanliere Canzoniero; Bhavana Bhatnagar; Maria R Baer; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Phase I and pharmacologic trial of cytosine arabinoside with the selective checkpoint 1 inhibitor Sch 900776 in refractory acute leukemias.

Authors:  Judith E Karp; Brian M Thomas; Jacqueline M Greer; Christopher Sorge; Steven D Gore; Keith W Pratz; B Douglas Smith; Karen S Flatten; Kevin Peterson; Paula Schneider; Karen Mackey; Tomoko Freshwater; Mark J Levis; Michael A McDevitt; Hetty E Carraway; Douglas E Gladstone; Margaret M Showel; Sabine Loechner; David A Parry; Jo Ann Horowitz; Randi Isaacs; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Comparison of Mitoxantrone in Combination with Intermediate-dose Cytarabine versus High-dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapies for Young Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Favorable and Intermediate Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Ji-Hao Zhou; Hai-Qing Lin; Qi Shen; Li-Na Hu; Guo-Qiang Li; Xiong-Fei Sun; Xin-You Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

8.  Prognostic implications of chromosome 17 abnormalities in the context of monosomal karyotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Vijaya R Bhatt; Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Lynne Abruzzo; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Keating; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 9.  Redox control of leukemia: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Mary E Irwin; Nilsa Rivera-Del Valle; Joya Chandra
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 8.401

10.  Comorbidity and performance status in acute myeloid leukemia patients: a nation-wide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  L S G Østgård; J M Nørgaard; H Sengeløv; M Severinsen; L S Friis; C W Marcher; I H Dufva; M Nørgaard
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.